Question:

Let \( T \) denote the sum of the convergent series
\[ 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{6} + \ldots + (-1)^{n+1} \frac{1}{n} + \ldots\]
and let \( S \) denote the sum of the convergent series
\[ 1 - \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{10} - \frac{1}{12} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\]
where
\[ a_{3m-2} = \frac{1}{2m-1} , a_{3m-1} = 0, \text{ and } a_{3m} = \frac{-1}{4m} \text{ for } m \in \mathbb{N}.\]
Then which one of the following is true?

Updated On: Nov 21, 2025
  • \( T = S \) and \( S \neq 0 \).
  • \( 2T = S \) and \( S \neq 0 \).
  • \( T = 2S \) and \( S \neq 0 \).
  • \( T = S = 0 \).
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

To solve this problem, we need to evaluate the given series expressions and analyze the relationship between \( T \) and \( S \).

The series for \( T \) is the well-known Leibniz series for the alternating harmonic series:

\(T = 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{6} + \ldots\)

This series converges to \(\ln(2)\) (the natural logarithm of 2).

Next, let's examine the series for \( S \):

\(S = 1 - \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{10} - \frac{1}{12} + \ldots + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\)

Where \(a_{3m-2} = \frac{1}{2m-1} , a_{3m-1} = 0, \text{ and } a_{3m} = \frac{-1}{4m}\) for \(m \in \mathbb{N}\).

The nature of the terms indicates that the series \( S \) combines terms from distinguishable sub-sequences.

  1. The positive terms are similar to the alternating harmonic series, contributing: \(1 + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \ldots = \frac{1}{2} \ln 2\).
  2. The negative terms cancel alternately in sequences of three, which alters the pattern from strictly alternating to a mixed pattern.

Let's consider the given rule for \(a_n\) to simplify:

\(a_{3m-2} = \frac{1}{2m-1}\) involves only odd reciprocals.
\(a_{3m} = \frac{-1}{4m}\) introduces additional multiples reducing the sum of negatives.

 

Now, consider combining these terms effectively:

Notice that:
\(S = \ln(2) \big/ 2\)

Considering these transformations and pattern reductions effectively give us:

Summarizing:
\(T = 2(\ln 2/2) = 2S\) confirming that:

The correct answer is: \( T = 2S \) and \( S \neq 0 \).

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in IIT JAM MA exam

View More Questions