Step 1: The expression involves a sum of terms as \( x \to \infty \). First, analyze the terms inside the limit by considering how each part behaves as \( x \to \infty \). The floor function \( [t] \) simplifies as \( x \) grows large.
Step 2: Simplify the sum involving \( \left[ k/x \right] \) terms, and use asymptotic analysis to approximate the behavior of the entire sum.
Step 3: After simplifying, solve for the least value of \( p \in \mathbb{N} \) such that the inequality holds true. Thus, the least value of \( p \) is found.
Let \( C_{t-1} = 28, C_t = 56 \) and \( C_{t+1} = 70 \). Let \( A(4 \cos t, 4 \sin t), B(2 \sin t, -2 \cos t) \text{ and } C(3r - n_1, r^2 - n - 1) \) be the vertices of a triangle ABC, where \( t \) is a parameter. If \( (3x - 1)^2 + (3y)^2 = \alpha \) is the locus of the centroid of triangle ABC, then \( \alpha \) equals:
Consider the lines $ x(3\lambda + 1) + y(7\lambda + 2) = 17\lambda + 5 $. If P is the point through which all these lines pass and the distance of L from the point $ Q(3, 6) $ is \( d \), then the distance of L from the point \( (3, 6) \) is \( d \), then the value of \( d^2 \) is
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
