Question

U kpa u pynshlur ïa u khynraw bad tyrrwa ïa ka Ruth lada —

• A. ka neh ha ka niam thymmai
• B. kam dei kaba la shongkurim
• C. ka la bam la jingbam u jingor jong ka
• D. ka treh ban sah ha ka shong jong ki
• A. Ruth
• B. Orpah
• C. ka kynthai Moab
• D. Naomi
• A. Ruth
• B. Orpah
• C. Ruth, Orpah
• D. Ruth, Orpah bad Chilion
• A. Ba kam don khun
• B. Ba ka dang don bad ka kiaw
• C. Ba ka dei kaba la ïap trga
• D. Ba ka long kaba shemmap

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage describes a moment when Ruth’s father encourages her to remain faithful to her new faith after marriage and to follow the customs of her new people.
This context is rooted in the Biblical story of Ruth, where she leaves her native land and religion to follow her mother-in-law Naomi and accept a new faith.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (1) ka neh ha ka niam thymmai: This means staying firm in the new religion, which aligns with the passage's message of devotion and loyalty.
- (2) kam dei kaba la shongkurim: Not relevant here, as Ruth’s marital status is already mentioned.
- (3) ka la bam la jingbam u jingor jong ka: This refers to daily life, not faith.
- (4) ka treh ban sah ha ka shong jong ki: While Ruth does stay with Naomi, the focus of the passage is her faithfulness, not just her stay.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (1) ka neh ha ka niam thymmai, as the father’s encouragement centers on spiritual perseverance and loyalty.

Answer 2

Step 1: Contextual understanding.
The passage narrates how Naomi’s two daughters-in-law, Ruth and Orpah, respond differently after their husbands’ deaths.
While Ruth chooses to remain loyal and follow Naomi to Israel, Orpah decides to return to her homeland.
Step 2: Father’s words of encouragement.
The discussion of the father’s encouragement regarding faithfulness or loyalty points toward Orpah, who initially hesitated and was persuaded to go back.
This reflects the advice or encouragement given about her choices and faith.
Step 3: Elimination of other options.
- (1) Ruth: She was not the one being discouraged; she remained steadfast.
- (3) ka kynthai Moab: This is too general and not specific to one person.
- (4) Naomi: She was the mother-in-law, not the daughter involved in this discussion.
Step 4: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (2) Orpah, as the passage’s context focuses on her decision-making moment when she returns to her people.

Answer 3

Step 1: Understanding the context.
The passage taken from the Book of Ruth in the Bible focuses on two key figures — Ruth and Orpah — who were both daughters-in-law of Naomi.
After the death of their husbands, Naomi advises them to return to their homeland. This discussion forms the emotional and moral center of the story.
Step 2: Analysis.
The story emphasizes faith, devotion, and the choice between returning to one’s old life or embracing a new spiritual journey.
Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi contrasts with Orpah’s decision to return home, highlighting their moral differences.
Thus, the passage centers around both women — Ruth and Orpah — as the key figures discussed by the teacher and learners.
Step 3: Elimination of options.
- (1) Ruth: Only partly correct, as the story includes Orpah as well.
- (2) Orpah: Incomplete since Ruth is equally central.
- (4) Ruth, Orpah bad Chilion: Incorrect; Chilion is mentioned but not the main focus of the conversation.
Step 4: Conclusion.
Hence, the correct answer is (3) Ruth, Orpah — both women are central to the discussion of faith and moral choice.

Answer 4

Step 1: Understanding the background.
The father’s hesitation or warning to his son about visiting Ruth comes from cultural and moral reasoning.
At that point in the narrative, Ruth was still closely connected to her former life and traditions, and thus the father was cautious.
Step 2: Explanation of the phrase “ka dang don bad ka kiaw.”
The phrase means “she is still associated with her old ties or customs.”
This shows that Ruth, being a Moabite woman, still symbolically belonged to her previous community, which could raise social or cultural conflict.
Step 3: Analyzing other options.
- (1) Ba kam don khun: Irrelevant to the situation; this is not the reason.
- (3) Ba ka dei kaba la ïap trga: Incorrect; Ruth was alive and active.
- (4) Ba ka long kaba shemmap: Not fitting with the moral tone of the story.
Step 4: Conclusion.
Therefore, the reason why the father forbade his son from meeting Ruth was (2) “Ba ka dang don bad ka kiaw” — she was still linked to her old traditions.