Question

In light of the principles enshrined in Article 39A, which of the following circumstances contradicts its core objective of equal justice and free legal aid?

• A. The state provides legal aid to economically disadvantaged citizens facing criminal prosecution.
• B. A wealthy individual is given legal aid despite having adequate resources to access private legal counsel.
• C. A marginalized person is granted legal representation in a civil matter by the state.
• D. The state facilitates access to justice for those affected by socio-economic disabilities.

Hint:

Article 39A ensures free legal aid primarily to economically and socially disadvantaged individuals to promote equal justice.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Article 39A of the Indian Constitution mandates the state to provide free legal aid to ensure that justice is not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. The core objective is to assist those who are unable to afford legal services.
Option (A), (C), and (D) reflect the intended purpose of Article 39A by focusing on providing legal aid to the disadvantaged.
Option (B) contradicts the principle as providing legal aid to wealthy individuals who can afford private counsel misallocates limited resources and defeats the objective of equal access to justice for the needy.
Thus, option (B) contradicts the core objective of Article 39A.