Step 1: For a binomial distribution, the mean is given by: \[ \mu = np = 200 \times 0.04 = 8. \] Since Poisson approximation is used, the mean of the Poisson distribution is also 8. Thus, Assertion (A) is true.
Step 2: The probability mass function of a Poisson distribution is: \[ P(X = k) = \frac{e^{-\mu} \cdot \mu^k}{k!}. \] Substituting \( \mu = 8 \) and \( k = 4 \): \[ P(X = 4) = \frac{e^{-8} \cdot 8^4}{4!} = \frac{512}{3e^8}. \] Since the given expression matches this calculation, Reason (R) is also true.
Step 3: However, Reason (R) does not directly explain why the mean of the Poisson distribution is 8. The mean of a Poisson distribution is derived from the binomial approximation (\( \lambda = np \)), not from the probability calculation of \( P(X = 4) \). Thus, Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are both true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
If vector \( \mathbf{a} = 3 \hat{i} + 2 \hat{j} - \hat{k} \) \text{ and } \( \mathbf{b} = \hat{i} - \hat{j} + \hat{k} \), then which of the following is correct?