A recursive relation: \[ x_{m+1} = x_m - (m + 1) \] with base value: \[ x_1 = -1 \]
Using the recurrence:
From the pattern, we see: \[ x_n = - (1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n) = -\frac{n(n+1)}{2} \]
To find: \[ x_{100} = -\frac{100 \times 101}{2} = -5050 \]
\(\boxed{-5050}\)
\[ x_1 = -1, \quad \text{and} \quad x_m = x_{m+1} + (m+1) \] Rearranging the recursive formula: \[ x_{m+1} = x_m - (m+1) \]
Let’s compute the first few values:
Clearly, the pattern becomes: \[ x_n = - (1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n) \] Which is the negative of the sum of the first \( n \) natural numbers.
\[ x_n = -\frac{n(n+1)}{2} \]
\[ x_{100} = -\frac{100(101)}{2} = -50 \times 101 = \boxed{-5050} \]
The correct option is (D): \[ \boxed{-5050} \]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)