To determine the validity of the given statements about chemical properties and allotropic forms, let's analyze each statement individually.
Based on the analysis:
Thus, the most appropriate answer is that Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
Statement (I):} This statement is correct. SiO$_2$ (silicon dioxide) and GeO$_2$ (germanium dioxide) exhibit acidic behavior as they are covalent oxides. On the other hand, SnO (tin(II) oxide) and PbO (lead(II) oxide) are amphoteric in nature, meaning they can react with both acids and bases.
Statement (II): This statement is false. While catenation is indeed a key property responsible for the existence of multiple allotropic forms of carbon, $\pi$-$\pi$ bond formation is not the primary reason for carbon allotropy. Instead, the different hybridization states (sp$^3$, sp$^2$, and sp) and bonding patterns play a more critical role.
Conclusion: Statement I is true as it accurately describes the nature of the oxides, while Statement II is false because it incorrectly attributes carbon allotropy primarily to $\pi$-$\pi$ bond formation.
Consider the following reaction sequence.

One mole each of \(A_2(g)\) and \(B_2(g)\) are taken in a 1 L closed flask and allowed to establish the equilibrium at 500 K: \(A_{2}(g)+B_{2}(g) \rightleftharpoons 2AB(g)\). The value of x (missing enthalpy of \(B_2\) or related parameter) is ______ . (Nearest integer)}