To determine the correctness of the statements concerning the likelihood of certain chemical reactions involving primary halides, we must analyze the molecular structure and the mechanism involved.
Statement I: CH\(_3\)-O-CH\(_2\)-Cl will undergo \( S_N1 \) reaction though it is a primary halide. The \( S_N1 \) reaction typically involves formation of a carbocation intermediate, which is more stable in tertiary carbons. However, in this case, if the leaving group, Cl\(^-\), departs, the resulting carbocation is stabilized by the adjacent oxygen atom through resonance. Therefore, Statement I is correct because the resonance stabilization provided by the oxygen allows the primary alkyl halide to undergo a \( S_N1 \) reaction.
Statement II: CH_3-C(-CH_3)(-CH_3)-CH_2-Cl will not undergo \( S_N2 \) reaction very easily though it is a primary halide. The \( S_N2 \) mechanism involves a backside attack, which requires unobstructed access to the electrophilic carbon. Here, even though it is a primary halide, the three bulky methyl groups surrounding the reactive center hinder the approach of the nucleophile, thus impeding the \( S_N2 \) reaction. Therefore, Statement II is correct as the steric hindrance prevents the \( S_N2 \) mechanism.
Based on these analyses, the most appropriate answer is that both Statement I and Statement II are correct.
For the thermal decomposition of \( N_2O_5(g) \) at constant volume, the following table can be formed, for the reaction mentioned below: \[ 2 N_2O_5(g) \rightarrow 2 N_2O_4(g) + O_2(g) \] Given: Rate constant for the reaction is \( 4.606 \times 10^{-2} \text{ s}^{-1} \).
A hydrocarbon which does not belong to the same homologous series of carbon compounds is
Let \( T_r \) be the \( r^{\text{th}} \) term of an A.P. If for some \( m \), \( T_m = \dfrac{1}{25} \), \( T_{25} = \dfrac{1}{20} \), and \( \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{25} T_r = 13 \), then \( 5m \displaystyle\sum_{r=m}^{2m} T_r \) is equal to: