Given a non empty set X, consider P(X) which is the set of all subsets of X.
Define the relation R in P(X) as follows:
For subsets A,B in P(X),ARB if and only if A⊂B.
Is R an equivalence relation on P(X)? Justify you answer:
Since every set is a subset of itself, ARA for all A ∈ P(X).
∴R is reflexive.
Let ARB ⇒ A ⊂ B.
This cannot be implied to B ⊂ A.
For instance, if A = {1, 2} and B = {1, 2, 3},
then it cannot be implied that B is related to A.
∴ R is not symmetric.
Further, if ARB and BRC,
then A ⊂ B and B ⊂ C.
\(\Rightarrow\) A ⊂ C \(\Rightarrow\) ARC
∴ R is transitive.
Hence, R is not an equivalence relation since it is not symmetric.
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.
The correct IUPAC name of \([ \text{Pt}(\text{NH}_3)_2\text{Cl}_2 ]^{2+} \) is: