To solve the given quadratic expression \((a + b - 2c)x^2 + (b + c - 2a)x + (c + a - 2b) = 0\) with a root \(\alpha \neq 1\), where the parameters satisfy \(0 < c < b < a\), we need to analyze the statements given in the question.
Therefore, the conclusion of this analysis is that both Statement I and II are true.
Let:
\[ f(x) = (a + b - 2c)x^2 + (b + c - 2a)x + (c + a - 2b) \]
Given that \( \alpha = -1 \) is a root of \( f(x) \), we substitute \( \alpha \) into the equation:
\[ f(\alpha) = (a + b - 2c)(-1)^2 + (b + c - 2a)(-1) + (c + a - 2b) = 0 \]
This simplifies to:
\[ a + b - 2c - b - c + 2a + c + a - 2b = 0 \]
Rearranging terms:
\[ 0 = a + b - 2c \]
Now, consider the conditions:
If the roots of the quadratic equation \( ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \) are real and equal, then:
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
