The question relates to the variation of the Coulomb force \( F \) with respect to \( \frac{1}{r^2} \) between two point charges. We need to determine the relationship between the magnitudes of \( q_1 \), \( q_2 \), and \( q_3 \) given \( q_2 \) is positive and the smallest in magnitude.
The Coulomb's law states that the force \( F \) between two point charges \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \) is given by:
\( F = \frac{k \cdot |q_1 \cdot q_2|}{r^2} \)
where \( k \) is Coulomb's constant.
Given that the graph indicates how force \( F \) varies with \( \frac{1}{r^2} \), the slope of this relationship will depend on the product of the charges \( |q_1 \cdot q_2| \). The magnitude of \( F \) is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of the charges.
From the information provided, \( q_2 \) has the least magnitude and is positive. The relationship between the magnitudes of \( q_1 \), \( q_2 \), and \( q_3 \) must account for this, leading us to: \( q_2<q_1<q_3 \)
To solve the problem, we need to understand the behavior of the Coulomb force between point charges as described by Coulomb's Law:
\[ F = k \frac{|q_1 \cdot q_2|}{r^2} \]
where \( F \) is the force between the charges, \( k \) is Coulomb's constant, \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \) are the magnitudes of the point charges, and \( r \) is the distance between them.
The problem states that \( q_2 \) is positive and is the least in magnitude. We need to determine the relationship between \( q_1 \), \( q_2 \), and \( q_3 \).
Given the force variation with \( \frac{1}{r^2} \), it implies a linear relationship if plotted with the variables appropriately transformed, ensuring that the product of the charges influences the slope. Since \( q_2 \) is the least and positive, any comparison would show that:
This establishes that among the choices provided:
Rupal, Shanu and Trisha were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 4:3:1. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 was as follows:
(i) Trisha's share of profit was entirely taken by Shanu.
(ii) Fixed assets were found to be undervalued by Rs 2,40,000.
(iii) Stock was revalued at Rs 2,00,000.
(iv) Goodwill of the firm was valued at Rs 8,00,000 on Trisha's retirement.
(v) The total capital of the new firm was fixed at Rs 16,00,000 which was adjusted according to the new profit sharing ratio of the partners. For this necessary cash was paid off or brought in by the partners as the case may be.
Prepare Revaluation Account and Partners' Capital Accounts.