The passage discusses how creativity, which was once seen as a stable and meaningful concept, has been over-valued and over-researched. This overemphasis has led to a loss of its original meaning, ultimately hindering true creativity. Let’s analyze the options provided to summarize this main idea:
This option accurately reflects the central theme of the passage, which explains how placing too much importance on creativity has resulted in a dilution of its meaning, ultimately hindering its genuine expression.
This option shifts the focus slightly by suggesting that creativity research has destroyed the process itself, while the passage focuses more on the loss of meaning rather than the destruction of the process.
While this option is somewhat accurate, it doesn't fully address the core idea of the passage, which is about the loss of true meaning due to overvaluation, rather than just the mutation of creativity’s identity.
This option conveys confusion around the concept of creativity, but it misses the deeper issue: the inflation of creativity’s value, which ultimately leads to a loss of its real meaning and impact on true creative expression.
Upon reviewing the options, Option 1 is the most accurate summary. It best captures the passage’s central idea that the overemphasis on creativity has diluted its meaning, thus hindering true creativity.
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
In investigating memory-beliefs, there are certain points which must be borne in mind. In the first place, everything constituting a memory-belief is happening now, not in that past time to which the belief is said to refer. It is not logically necessary to the existence of a memory-belief that the event remembered should have occurred, or even that the past should have existed at all. There is no logical impossibility in the hypothesis that the world sprang into being five minutes ago, exactly as it then was, with a population that "remembered" a wholly unreal past. There is no logically necessary connection between events at different times; therefore nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future can disprove the hypothesis that the world began five minutes ago. Hence the occurrences which are CALLED knowledge of the past are logically independent of the past; they are wholly analysable into present contents, which might, theoretically, be just what they are even if no past had existed.
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: