Determine whether each of the following relations are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
(i) R={(1,3),(2,6),(3,3),(4,12)}
R is not reflexive because (1,1)(2,2)...and(14,14)∉R Also, R is not symmetric as (1, 3) ∈R, but (3, 1) ∉ R. [3(3) − 1 ≠ 0]
Also, R is not transitive as (1, 3), (3, 9) ∈R, but (1, 9) ∉ R. [3(1) − 9 ≠ 0]
Hence, R is neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
(ii) R = {(x, y): y = x + 5 and x < 4} = {(1, 6), (2, 7), (3, 8)} It is seen that (1, 1) ∉ R.
∴R is not reflexive.
(1, 6) ∈R
But,(1, 6) ∉ R.
∴R is not symmetric.
Now, since there is no pair in R such that (x, y) and (y, z) ∈ R so,we need to look for the ordered pair (x,y). therefore R is transitive.
Hence, R is neither reflexive ,nor symmetric but it is transitive.
(iii) A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
R = {(x, y): y is divisible by x}
We know that any number (x) is divisible by itself.
(x, x) ∈R
∴R is reflexive.
Now, (2, 4) ∈R [as 4 is divisible by 2]
But, (4, 2) ∉ R. [as 2 is not divisible by 4]
∴R is not symmetric.
Let (x, y), (y, z) ∈ R. Then, y is divisible by x and z is divisible by y.
∴z is divisible by x.
⇒ (x, z) ∈R
∴R is transitive.
Hence, R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
(iv) R = {(x, y): x − y is an integer}
Now, for every x ∈ Z, (x, x) ∈R as x − x = 0 is an integer.
∴R is reflexive.
Now, for every x, y ∈ Z if (x, y) ∈ R, then x − y is an integer.
⇒ −(x − y) is also an integer.
⇒ (y − x) is an integer.
∴ (y, x) ∈ R
∴R is symmetric.
Now, Let (x, y) and (y, z) ∈R, where x, y, z ∈ Z.
⇒ (x − y) and (y − z) are integers.
⇒ x − z = (x − y) + (y − z) is an integer ∴ (x, z) ∈R
∴R is transitive.
Hence, R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
(v) (a) R = {(x, y): x and y work at the same place} (x, x) ∈ R
∴ R is reflexive.
If (x, y) ∈ R, then x and y work at the same place.
⇒ y and x work at the same place.
⇒ (y, x) ∈ R.
∴R is symmetric.
Now, let (x, y), (y, z) ∈ R
⇒ x and y work at the same place and y and z work at the same place.
⇒ x and z work at the same place.
⇒ (x, z) ∈R
∴ R is transitive.
Hence, R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
(b) R = {(x, y): x and y live in the same locality}
Clearly (x, x) ∈ R as x and x is the same human being.
∴ R is reflexive.
If (x, y) ∈R, then x and y live in the same locality.
⇒ y and x live in the same locality.
⇒ (y, x) ∈ R
∴R is symmetric.
Now, let (x, y) ∈ R and (y, z) ∈ R.
⇒ x and y live in the same locality and y and z live in the same locality.
⇒ x and z live in the same locality.
⇒ (x, z) ∈ R
∴ R is transitive.
Hence, R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
(c) R = {(x, y): x is exactly 7 cm taller than y}
Now, (x, x) ∉ R
Since human being x cannot be taller than himself.
∴R is not reflexive.
Now, let (x, y) ∈R.
⇒ x is exactly 7 cm taller than y.
Then, y is not taller than x.
∴ (y, x) ∉R
Indeed if x is exactly 7 cm taller than y, then y is exactly 7 cm shorter than x.
∴R is not symmetric.
Now, Let (x, y), (y, z) ∈ R.
⇒ x is exactly 7 cm taller than y and y is exactly 7 cm taller than z.
⇒ x is exactly 14 cm taller than z .
∴(x, z) ∉R
∴ R is not transitive.
Hence, R is neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
(d) R = {(x, y): x is the wife of y}
Now, (x, x) ∉ R
Since x cannot be the wife of herself.
∴R is not reflexive.
Now, let (x, y) ∈ R
⇒ x is the wife of y.
Clearly y is not the wife of x.
∴(y, x) ∉ R
Indeed if x is the wife of y, then y is the husband of x.
∴ R is not transitive.
Let (x, y), (y, z) ∈ R
⇒ x is the wife of y and y is the wife of z.
This case is not possible. Also, this does not imply that x is the wife of z.
∴(x, z) ∉ R
∴R is not transitive.
Hence, R is neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
(e) R = {(x, y): x is the father of y}
(x, x) ∉ R
As x cannot be the father of himself.
∴R is not reflexive.
Now, let (x, y) ∈R.
⇒ x is the father of y.
⇒ y cannot be the father of y.
Indeed, y is the son or the daughter of y.
∴(y, x) ∉ R
∴ R is not symmetric.
Now, let (x, y) ∈ R and (y, z) ∈ R.
⇒ x is the father of y and y is the father of z.
⇒ x is not the father of z.
Indeed x is the grandfather of z.
∴ (x, z) ∉ R
∴R is not transitive.
Hence, R is neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
Rupal, Shanu and Trisha were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 4:3:1. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 was as follows:
(i) Trisha's share of profit was entirely taken by Shanu.
(ii) Fixed assets were found to be undervalued by Rs 2,40,000.
(iii) Stock was revalued at Rs 2,00,000.
(iv) Goodwill of the firm was valued at Rs 8,00,000 on Trisha's retirement.
(v) The total capital of the new firm was fixed at Rs 16,00,000 which was adjusted according to the new profit sharing ratio of the partners. For this necessary cash was paid off or brought in by the partners as the case may be.
Prepare Revaluation Account and Partners' Capital Accounts.
Relation is said to be empty relation if no element of set X is related or mapped to any element of X i.e, R = Φ.
A relation R in a set, say A is a universal relation if each element of A is related to every element of A.
R = A × A.
Every element of set A is related to itself only then the relation is identity relation.
Let R be a relation from set A to set B i.e., R ∈ A × B. The relation R-1 is said to be an Inverse relation if R-1 from set B to A is denoted by R-1
If every element of set A maps to itself, the relation is Reflexive Relation. For every a ∈ A, (a, a) ∈ R.
A relation R is said to be symmetric if (a, b) ∈ R then (b, a) ∈ R, for all a & b ∈ A.
A relation is said to be transitive if, (a, b) ∈ R, (b, c) ∈ R, then (a, c) ∈ R, for all a, b, c ∈ A
A relation is said to be equivalence if and only if it is Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive.