To solve this problem, we need to analyze the given system of equations and determine when it has a unique solution, infinite solutions, or is inconsistent. The system of equations is:
We'll examine each condition provided in the options by understanding the different scenarios arising from \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\).
Step 1: Analyze the system.
The system can be represented in matrix form as \( A \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b} \), where:
\(A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & \lambda^2 \\ 1 & 3 & \lambda \end{bmatrix}, \mathbf{x} = \begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix}, \mathbf{b} = \begin{bmatrix} 5 \\ 9 \\ \mu \end{bmatrix}\)
Step 2: Check for infinite solutions.
Infinite solutions occur when the system has dependent equations, meaning the rank of matrix \( A \) is less than the number of variables (here, 3). An easy approach is to check if any of the equations are multiples or linear combinations of each other.
Let's substitute \(\lambda = 1\) and \(\mu = 13\) into the system:
The system simplifies to a form where equations become linearly dependent. They do not provide unique values for each variable, leading to infinite solutions.
Step 3: Check for inconsistency.
An inconsistent system does not have any solutions. This can happen if, after row reduction, an equation like \( 0 = c \) (where \( c \neq 0 \)) appears.
For \(\lambda = 1\) and \(\mu \neq 13\), the system would reduce to an inconsistency since modifying the constant term \(\mu\) results in a contradiction after solving.
Step 4: Check for consistency when \(\lambda \neq 1\).
For \(\lambda \neq 1\), the coefficient matrix does not lead to linear dependency, as \( \lambda^2 \neq \lambda \). For \( \mu = 13 \), the matrix is potentially consistent depending on \(\lambda\).
Step 5: Check for uniqueness when \(\lambda \neq 1\) and \(\mu \neq 13\).
If neither value causes the system to degenerate or contradict, altering both \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) implies differentiability and a unique solution set, as all equations can be differentiated to provide specific values for \( x, y, \) and \( z \).
Conclusion:
The correct answer is: System has a unique solution if \(\lambda \neq 1\) and \(\mu \neq 13\). This statement is NOT correct based on our analysis.
Convert the system to matrix form and perform row reduction:
\[ \left(\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & 1 & 5 \\ 1 & 2 & 2 & 9 \\ 1 & 3 & \lambda & \mu \end{array}\right) \rightarrow \left(\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & 1 & 5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 2 & \lambda - 1 & \mu - 5 \end{array}\right) \rightarrow \left(\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & 1 & 5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda - 3 & \mu - 13 \end{array}\right) \]
For consistency: Unique solution if \(\lambda \neq 3\).
Infinite solutions if \(\lambda = 3\) and \(\mu = 13\).
No solution if \(\lambda = 3\) and \(\mu \neq 13\).
Therefore, the incorrect statement is:
(4) System has unique solution if \(\lambda = 1\) and \(\mu \neq 13\).
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).
In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure. The transmission axes of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \) are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer \( P_3 \) covers both the slits with its transmission axis at \( 45^\circ \) to those of \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). An unpolarized light of wavelength \( \lambda \) and intensity \( I_0 \) is incident on \( P_1 \) and \( P_2 \). The intensity at a point after \( P_3 \), where the path difference between the light waves from \( S_1 \) and \( S_2 \) is \( \frac{\lambda}{3} \), is:
