Consider f: {1, 2, 3} \(\to\) {a, b, c} given by f(1) = a, f(2) = b and f(3) = c. Find f−1 and show that (f−1)−1= f.

Function f: {1, 2, 3} \(\to\) {a, b, c} is given by, 
f(1) = a, f(2) = b, and f(3) = c 
If we define g: {a, b, c} \(\to\) {1, 2, 3} as g(a) = 1, g(b) = 2, g(c) = 3, then we have:
(fog)(a) = f(g(a)) = f(1) = a 
(fog)(b) = f(g(b)) = f(2) = b 
(fog)(c) = f(g(c)) = f(3) = c 
And,
(gof(1)) = g(f(1)) = g(a) = 1 
(gof(2)) = g(f(2)) =g(b) = 2 
(gof(3)) = g(f(3)) = g(c) = 3 
∴ gof = Ix and fog=IY , where X = {1, 2, 3} and Y= {a, b, c}. 
Thus, the inverse of f exists and f−1 = g. 
∴f−1: {a, b, c} \(\to\) {1, 2, 3} is given by,
f−1(a) = 1, f−1(b) = 2, f-1(c) = 3 
Let us now find the inverse of f−1 i.e., find the inverse of g. 
If we define h: {1, 2, 3} \(\to\) {a, b, c} as 
h(1) = a, h(2) = b, h(3) = c, then we have:
(gof(1)) = g(f(1)) = g(a) = 1 
(gof(2)) = g(f(2)) = g(b) = 2 
(gof(3)) = g(f(3)) = g(c) = 3 
And,
(hog)(a) = h(g(a)) = h(1) = a 
(hog)(b) = h(g(b)) = h(2) = b 
(hog)(c) =h(g(c)) = h(3) = c 
∴ goh = Ix, hog=Iy where X = {1, 2, 3} and Y = {a, b, c}. 
Thus, the inverse of g exists and g−1 = h
\(\implies\) (f−1)−1 = h.
It can be noted that h = f. 
Hence, (f−1)−1 = f.
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.
During the festival season, a mela was organized by the Resident Welfare Association at a park near the society. The main attraction of the mela was a huge swing, which traced the path of a parabola given by the equation:\[ x^2 = y \quad \text{or} \quad f(x) = x^2 \]
What did the hunters decide to do when they realized that the tiger was not dead? (The Tiger King)
Alexia Limited invited applications for issuing 1,00,000 equity shares of ₹ 10 each at premium of ₹ 10 per share.
The amount was payable as follows:
Applications were received for 1,50,000 equity shares and allotment was made to the applicants as follows:
Category A: Applicants for 90,000 shares were allotted 70,000 shares.
Category B: Applicants for 60,000 shares were allotted 30,000 shares.
Excess money received on application was adjusted towards allotment and first and final call.
Shekhar, who had applied for 1200 shares failed to pay the first and final call. Shekhar belonged to category B.
Pass necessary journal entries for the above transactions in the books of Alexia Limited. Open calls in arrears and calls in advance account, wherever necessary.