Question:

Certain species of ibex and weevils depend on the same food source. A study finds that the removal of ibex results in an increase in the number of weevils, but the removal of weevils does not affect the ibex. Which one of the following options best describes this interaction?

Show Hint

Amensalism is an interaction where one species is harmed and the other is unaffected. This can occur when one species inhibits the growth or survival of another without benefiting itself.
Updated On: Apr 8, 2025
  • Amensalism
  • Commensalism
  • Mutualism
  • Parasitism
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the concept of amensalism.
Amensalism is a biological interaction where one species is harmed while the other remains unaffected. In this scenario, the removal of ibex leads to an increase in weevil numbers, suggesting that the ibex negatively affects the weevils. However, the removal of weevils does not impact the ibex population, indicating the ibex is unaffected by the weevils.

Step 2: Analyze the other options.
  • Commensalism: One species benefits and the other is unaffected — not applicable here as ibex do not benefit from the weevils.
  • Mutualism: Both species benefit — clearly not the case here.
  • Parasitism: One species benefits at the expense of another — again, ibex do not benefit from weevils.
Conclusion: The correct ecological interaction described is amensalism.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Ecology

View More Questions

Questions Asked in GATE EY exam

View More Questions