It is stated that 200 candidates scored above the 90th percentile overall in the Common Entrance Test (CET). The subsequent Venn diagram illustrates the distribution of individuals who scored above the 80th percentile in each of the three sections.
Candidate Selection Deduction
\[ h = 0 \]
\[ d + e + f = 150 \]
Given \(a = b = c\) and total candidates = 200: \[ 3a + g = 200 - 150 = 50 \]
The ratio: \[ (2a + f) : (2a + e) : (2a + d) = 4 : 2 : 1 \] Sum of ratio terms: \[ 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 \] Thus: \[ 6a + (d + e + f) \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \] Since \(d + e + f = 150\): \[ 6a + 150 \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \] \[ \Rightarrow 6a + 3 \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \]
This divisibility condition gives: \[ a = 3, \ 10, \ 17, \ \dots \] From \(3a + g = 50\), \(a < 17\), so: \[ \boxed{a = 3 \quad \text{or} \quad a = 10} \]
Candidates at or above the 90th percentile and at or above the 80th percentile in at least two sections are: \[ d, e, f, g \]
BIE evaluates AET candidates who are also at or above the 80th percentile in \(P\) → \(d, e, g\):
Total at/above 80th percentile in \(P\) = 400. Subtract the “P80 + Overall90” group:
Number of candidates taking the separate test for BIE who were also at or above the 90th percentile in CET equals: \[ \boxed{a = 3 \quad \text{or} \quad a = 10} \]
It is stated that 200 candidates scored above the 90th percentile overall in the Common Entrance Test (CET). The subsequent Venn diagram illustrates the distribution of individuals who scored above the 80th percentile in each of the three sections.
Derivation from Equations and Candidate Selection
From equation (1): \[ h = 0 \]
\[ d + e + f = 150 \]
Given \(a = b = c\) and the total candidates = 200: \[ 3a + g = 200 - 150 = 50 \]
The ratio is: \[ (2a + f) : (2a + e) : (2a + d) = 4 : 2 : 1 \] Sum of ratio terms: \[ 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 \] This means: \[ 6a + (d + e + f) \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \] Since \(d + e + f = 150\): \[ 6a + 150 \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \] \[ \Rightarrow 6a + 3 \ \text{is divisible by} \ 7 \]
The above condition gives: \[ a = 3, \ 10, \ 17, \ \dots \] From \(3a + g = 50\), \(a < 17\), so: \[ \boxed{a = 3 \quad \text{or} \quad a = 10} \]
Candidates at or above the 90th percentile overall and at or above the 80th percentile in at least two sections = \(d, e, f, g\).
BIE considers candidates at or above the 80th percentile in \(P\) among AET qualifiers → these are \(d, e, g\):
Total candidates at/above 80th percentile in \(P\) = 400.
Given \(g\) is a multiple of 5 → \(\boxed{g = 20}\), which fixes \(a = 10\).
These are \(e + g\): \[ e + g = 40 + 20 = \boxed{60} \]
It is stated that 200 candidates scored above the 90th percentile overall in the Common Entrance Test (CET). The subsequent Venn diagram illustrates the distribution of individuals who scored above the 80th percentile in each of the three sections.
Case 1 and Case 2 Candidate Analysis
The divisibility condition yields: \[ a = 3, \ 10, \ 17, \dots \] From \( 3a + g = 50 \), \(a < 17\), so: \[ \boxed{a = 3 \ \text{or} \ 10} \]
For \( a = 3 \): \[ d = 18, \quad e = 42, \quad f = 90, \quad g = 41 \] For \( a = 10 \): \[ d = 10, \quad e = 40, \quad f = 100, \quad g = 20 \]
Candidates at or above the 90th percentile in overall score and at or above the 80th percentile in at least two sections are selected for AET. These are represented by: \[ \{ d, \ e, \ f, \ g \} \] For \(a = 10\): \[ d + e + f + g = 10 + 40 + 100 + 20 = 170 \]
BIE considers candidates:
These are \(d, e, g\): \[ \text{For } a = 3: \ d+e+g = 18 + 42 + 41 = 101 \ \ (\text{given as 104 in context}) \] \[ \text{For } a = 10: \ d+e+g = 10 + 40 + 20 = 70 \ \ (\text{given as 80 in context}) \]
Total at or above 80th percentile in \(P\) = 400. Subtract the candidates already in the “P80 + Overall90” group:
In the \(a = 10\) case, \(g = 20\) and total shortlisted for AET = \(\mathbf{170}\).
It is stated that 200 candidates scored above the 90th percentile overall in the Common Entrance Test (CET). The subsequent Venn diagram illustrates the distribution of individuals who scored above the 80th percentile in each of the three sections.
Candidate Selection Analysis
From the above, the feasible integer solutions are:
Among candidates at or above the 90th percentile overall, those at or above the 80th percentile in at least two sections (\(d, e, f, g\)) are selected for the AET:
BIE evaluates candidates:
BIE conducts a separate test for other students who are:
Given: \[ \text{Total at/above 80th percentile in P} = 400 \] Subtracting the candidates already in the “90th percentile + P80” category:
From the given CET condition: Number of candidates at or above 90th percentile overall and P80 in CET = 104. Adding the 3 special CET cases: \[ \text{Separate test count} = 296 + 3 = 299 \]
\[ \boxed{\text{Number of candidates for separate test = 299}} \]