To determine the second highest rating given by the tea taster, we need to piece together the information logically from the provided clues. The six ratings given were unique integers from 1 to 10, one assigned per cup.
Let's analyze the provided conditions:
Step-by-step deduction:
Hence, the second highest rating given is 7, fitting within the specified range of 7,7.
| Cup | Tea | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | Himachal |
Steps to solve:
Final configuration after resolving:
| Cup | Tea | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munnar | 3 |
| 2 | Darjeeling | 2 |
| 3 | Wayanad | 8 |
| 4 | Ooty | 10 |
| 5 | Assam | 4 |
| 6 | Himachal | 6 |
Verification: Confirmed, Cup 4 fits & meets Ooty condition with the given range 4,4.
To determine the rating of the tea from Wayanad, we will systematically use the given clues:
Let's analyze:
This limits the choices: Munnar has 1, Wayanad scores 5 (higher than Munnar yet less than Assam). Thus, the rating for Wayanad:
5
To solve the problem, we must assign teas from different locations to cup numbers based on the given conditions.
Understanding these constraints, we analyze:
1. Cup 2 has the lowest rating, which must be 2 as it's even.
2. Cup 4 cannot be Ooty, as it's paired with Wayanad.
3. If Ooty's tea goes to Cup 5 with a rating of 10 (maximum), then Cup 3's rating becomes 5, neither of which works since 3 needs to be more than 5. If Ooty is Cup 5, then Cup 3's must be 8 (rating is possible by hypothesis). Thus, Cups harmony doesn't match ratings.
4. The positioning must allow alignment with conditions. Therefore, this logic should rearrange the teas as:
- Cup 1: Darjeeling (potentially)
- Cup 2: [Minimum rated]
- Cup 3: [Challenge to align max]
- Cup 4: [Assumption range]
- Cup 5: [Precursor of best]
- Cup 6: Himachal
| Cup Number | Tea Origin | Rating (by elimination) |
| 1 | Darjeeling | To be confirmed (aligns min) |
| 2 | Wayanad (when rated even) | 2 (Even, Min) |
| 3 | As comparator | R (When considering Ooty) |
| 4 | Ooty | R+2 / R-1 |
| 5 | Assam | Variable Altitude Up |
| 6 | Himachal | Aligned |
In conclusion, these constraints favor the statement "Cup 1 contains tea from Darjeeling" as possible due to alignment and numeric adjustments.
At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu. At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3. & nbsp;
The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.
1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu (Novice manager):
– Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2. & nbsp;
– Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.