Step 1: State the relationship between the amplitudes of electric and magnetic fields in an electromagnetic wave. In a vacuum (or air, approximately), the magnitudes of the electric field (\(E\)) and magnetic field (\(B\)) at any instant are related by: \[ E = cB \] where \(c\) is the speed of light. This relationship also holds for their maximum values (amplitudes), \(E_0\) and \(B_0\). \[ E_0 = c B_0 \]
Step 2: Identify the maximum magnetic field (\(B_0\)) from the given equation. The equation for the magnetic field is given in the form \( B_z = B_0 \sin(\dots) \). By comparing, we can see that the amplitude (maximum value) of the magnetic field is \( B_0 = 2 \times 10^{-6} \) T.
Step 3: Calculate the maximum electric field (\(E_0\)). Use the value of the speed of light, \( c \approx 3 \times 10^8 \) m/s. \[ E_0 = (3 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}) \times (2 \times 10^{-6} \text{ T}) \] \[ E_0 = 6 \times 10^2 \text{ V/m} = 600 \text{ V/m} \]
Figure shows a current carrying square loop ABCD of edge length is $ a $ lying in a plane. If the resistance of the ABC part is $ r $ and that of the ADC part is $ 2r $, then the magnitude of the resultant magnetic field at the center of the square loop is:
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |