List of top Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning (DILR) Questions

The question is followed by two statements numbered I and II. You must decide whether the data provided in the statements is sufficient to answer the question. Question: What is the speed of the train? Statements: I. The train covers a distance of 300 kilometers in 4 hours. II. The train's average speed during the journey is 75 kilometers per hour.

Each question below consists of a question followed by two statements numbered I and II. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question Question: How many siblings does Tom have? Statements: I. Tom has two sisters. II. Each of Tom's sisters has one brother.

Each question below consists of a question followed by two statements numbered I and II. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question Question: What is the total number of students in the class? Statements: I. There are 25 boys in the class. II. The ratio of boys to girls is 2:1.

Question consist of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which a ‘weak’ argument. Statement: Should the use of plastic be banned worldwide? Arguments: I. Yes. It is essential for environmental conservation and reducing pollution. II. No. It is a versatile material with various applications and banning it would disrupt industries.

The question consists of a statement and two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which a ‘weak’ argument Statement: Should social media platforms have stricter regulations on content to combat misinformation? Arguments: I. Yes. It helps prevent the spread of false information and protects users. II. No. It infringes on freedom of speech and expression.

The question consists of a statement and two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which a ‘weak’ argument Statement: Should public transportation be made free in urban areas? Arguments: I. Yes. It would reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. II. No. It would lead to misuse and financial burden on the government.

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement. Statement: The city administration is implementing a new waste management system. Assumptions: I. The current waste management system is ineffective. II. The residents are willing to cooperate with the new system.

In the question, a statement is given, followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement Statement: The company has decided to launch a new product with advanced features. Assumptions: I. Consumers are always interested in products with advanced features. II. The company has conducted market research to identify consumer preferences.

In the question below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: The traffic signal is red. Conclusions: I. All vehicles must stop. II. Pedestrians can cross the road.

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: The train arrived late at the station. Conclusions: I. The train schedule was disrupted. II. Passengers were unhappy with the delay.

In the question below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: All students passed the mathematics exam. Conclusions: I. Every student is good at mathematics. II. No student failed the mathematics exam.

In the question below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: All actors are trained in performing arts. Conclusions: I. Every person trained in performing arts is an actor. II. Some actors may not be trained in performing arts.

If every candidate who completes the training program gets a job, and Tom got a job, can we conclude that Tom completed the training program?

In the question below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: All students in the class passed the exam. Conclusions: I. Every student is good at academics. II. No student failed the exam.

If no scholars are athletes, and some athletes are musicians, can we infer that no scholars are musicians?

If no graduates are unemployed, and some unemployed people are not graduates, can we conclude that some graduates are employed?

If all leaders are strategic thinkers, and some strategic thinkers are not leaders, can we infer that some leaders are not strategic thinkers?

If some employees are satisfied with their jobs, and all satisfied employees are productive, can we infer that some employees are productive?

If all MBA students are ambitious, and some ambitious people are not MBA students, can we infer that some MBA students are not ambitious?

If every successful entrepreneur is innovative, and John is innovative, can we conclude that John is a successful entrepreneur?

If 25\(\%\) of students like math, and 60\(\%\) of those who like math also like science, what percentage of students like both math and science?

If 60\(\%\) of students in a class are female, and 40\(\%\) of the females wear glasses, what percentage of the class wears glasses?

If the average age of a group of 5 people is 30 years, and one person leaves the group, what is the new average age?

If some graduates are employed and all employed people are financially stable, can we infer that some graduates are financially stable?

If 20\(\%\) of a company's employees are managers, and 10\(\%\) of the managers are also team leaders, what percentage of the employees are both managers and team leaders?