
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 |
To solve the problem, we need to follow these logical steps based on the conditions provided:
Upon evaluating row sums, the least sum (11) is correctly computed, falling within the expected range of (4, 4). Therefore, the third row has the smallest sum satisfying the conditions.
Both I and II
Neither I nor II
Using the given conditions, we can determine the following placements:
Thus, both statements (I) and (II) are true.
Neither I nor II
Both I and II
Based on the conditions:
As a result, neither statement I nor II must be true, making the correct option 2. Neither I nor II.
Based on the given constraints, we can deduce the following:
(a) 1 and 10:
• Must be in the same row or column.
• Due to increasing rows and decreasing columns, they must be placed in opposite corners.
• Possible placements:
– 1 in Row 1, Column 1 and 10 in Row 4, Column 1.
– 1 in Row 4, Column 4 and 10 in Row 1, Column 4.
(b) 4 and 6:
• Must be in the same row.
• Cannot be in Row 1 or Row 4 (due to 1 and 10).
• So, they must be in either Row 2 or Row 3.
(c) 2, 3, 7, and 8:
• Their placements are restricted by the placements of 1, 10, 4, and 6.
(d) Uncertain Slots:
• Due to these constraints, we cannot definitively determine the placement of num-
bers in the following two slots:
– The slot in Row 4, Column 2 or Column 3: This slot cannot be filled with 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, or 10.
– The other slot in Row 4: This slot also cannot be filled with 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, or 10.
Therefore, the answer to the question ”For how many slots in the grid, placement of
numbers CANNOT be determined with certainty?” is 2.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Row 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Row 3 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Row 4 | 10 |
Note: Other valid configurations may exist, but the number of uncertain slots remains
the same.
Based on the given constraints, we can deduce the following:
(a) 1 and 10:
• Must be in the same row or column.
• Due to increasing rows and decreasing columns, they must be placed in opposite corners.
• Possible placements:
– 1 in Row 1, Column 1 and 10 in Row 4, Column 1.
– 1 in Row 4, Column 4 and 10 in Row 1, Column 4.
(b) 4 and 6:
• Must be in the same row.
• Cannot be in Row 1 or Row 4 (due to 1 and 10).
• So, they must be in either Row 2 or Row 3.
(c) 2, 3, 7, and 8:
• Their placements are restricted by the placements of 1, 10, 4, and 6.
Determining the Sum of Column 4:
Considering the constraints and the possible placements, we can deduce that:
- Column 4 must contain the numbers 1, 9, and 10.
Therefore, the sum of the numbers in Column 4 is:
1 + 9 + 10 = 20
Thus, the final answer is 20.
A train travels from Station A to Station E, passing through stations B, C, and D, in that order. The train has a seating capacity of 200. A ticket may be booked from any station to any other station ahead on the route, but not to any earlier station. A ticket from one station to another reserves one seat on every intermediate segment of the route. For example, a ticket from B to E reserves a seat in the intermediate segments B– C, C– D, and D–E. The occupancy factor for a segment is the total number of seats reserved in the segment as a percentage of the seating capacity. The total number of seats reserved for any segment cannot exceed 200. The following information is known. 1. Segment C– D had an occupancy factor of 952. Exactly 40 tickets were booked from B to C and 30 tickets were booked from B to E. 3. Among the seats reserved on segment D– E, exactly four-sevenths were from stations before C. 4. The number of tickets booked from A to C was equal to that booked from A to E, and it was higher than that from B to E. 5. No tickets were booked from A to B, from B to D and from D to E. 6. The number of tickets booked for any segment was a multiple of 10.