Dimensional analysis helps in deriving expressions that are dimensionally consistent. We analyze each of the options:
- Option (1) \( F = \epsilon r v \) cannot be derived directly using dimensional analysis as it involves unknown constants and factors not defined by basic physical dimensions.
- Option (2) \( s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a t^2 \) is the standard kinematic equation for displacement under constant acceleration, which can indeed be derived using dimensional analysis, as the units of each term are consistent with displacement.
- Option (3) \( x = A \cos \omega t \) is a solution to simple harmonic motion, and while it is physically correct, its dimensional consistency needs more information for derivation.
- Option (4) \( N = N_0 2^t \) involves exponential growth, and dimensional analysis does not provide a simple way to deduce this relationship.
Thus, the correct answer is the kinematic equation \( s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a t^2 \), which is a standard result in mechanics.