Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the specific function of the second paragraph. We need to identify its role in the overall structure of the author's argument, especially in relation to the first paragraph.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The second paragraph begins with a crucial transition: "Although these frustrations are understandable..." This signals a shift from acknowledging the problem to presenting a counterpoint. The paragraph then lays out the central justification for the language requirement: its necessity for research. It argues that "adequate research can only be done" with foreign language skills and that without them, a student's research would suffer a "great loss." The author is essentially saying that despite the difficulties, there is a very good reason for the exams.
Let's evaluate the options:
- (A), (B), and (D) are not discussed in the paragraph.
- (C) The author explicitly states the frustrations are "understandable," which is the opposite of condemning students as lazy.
- (E) This option perfectly captures the paragraph's function. After acknowledging the frustrations, the author presents their core argument to show that the exams are not arbitrary but are a "reasonable" and "important component" of graduate education because of their direct link to research quality.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The purpose of the second paragraph is to provide the justification for the language exam system, thereby arguing for its reasonableness. Option (E) is the best description of this purpose.
For the past two years at FasCorp, there has been a policy to advertise any job opening to current employees and to give no job to an applicant from outside the company if a FasCorp employee applies who is qualified for the job. This policy has been strictly followed, yet even though numerous employees of FasCorp have been qualified for any given entry-level position, some entry-level jobs have been filled with people from outside the company.
If the information provided is true, which of the following must on the basis of it also be true about FasCorp during the past two years?
As an example of the devastation wrought on music publishers by the photocopier, one executive noted that for a recent choral festival with 1,200 singers, the festival’s organizing committee purchased only 12 copies of the music published by her company that was 5 performed as part of the festival.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the support the example lends to the executive’s contention that music publishers have been devastated by the photocopier?
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)