To solve the problem, we need to determine the time it takes for two trains traveling towards each other to meet, given different start times and speeds.
1. Understanding the Situation:
- Distance between stations X and Y = 300 km
- Speed of Train A = 60 km/h
- Speed of Train B = 90 km/h
- Train A starts 1 hour earlier than Train B
- Let the time taken by Train B after it starts until the trains meet be t hours
- In this time, Train A would have traveled for t + 1 hours
Key Concept: When two objects move towards each other, the distance covered together is the sum of the distances they travel individually. So, Distance = Distance by Train A + Distance by Train B
2. Setting Up the Equation:
Let the meeting point be reached after t hours from the time Train B starts.
Then: Distance covered by Train A = 60 × (t + 1) Distance covered by Train B = 90 × t
According to the problem: $ 60(t + 1) + 90t = 300 $
3. Solving the Equation:
Expanding the left side: $ 60t + 60 + 90t = 300 $
Combining like terms: $ 150t + 60 = 300 $
Subtract 60 from both sides: $ 150t = 240 $
Divide both sides by 150: $ t = \frac{240}{150} = 1.6 \, \text{hours} $
4. Converting to Minutes:
$ 0.6 \, \text{hours} = 0.6 \times 60 = 36 \, \text{minutes} $
So, the time taken after Train B starts = 1 hour and 36 minutes
Final Answer:
The two trains will meet 1 hour and 36 minutes after Train B starts.
The prisoners in the concentration camps in World War-II had lost faith in the future. Being in the camp, I felt disgusted with the state of affairs and I forced my thoughts to turn to another subject. ”Suddenly, I saw myself standing on the platform of a well-lit, warm and pleasant lecture room. In front of me, the attentive audience were seated in comfortable upholstered seats. I saw myself giving a lecture on hope, optimism, and resilience under difficult circumstances.” Suddenly, all that oppressed me stopped giving me pain and distress. This practice was so impactful that I could succeed in rising above the situation and the sufferings of the moment.”
Just as individuals compare themselves with others in terms of similarities and differences with respect to what they have and what others have, individuals also compare the group they belong to with groups of which they are not a member. It has been found that groups are more likely to take extreme decisions than individuals alone. Suppose there is an employee who has been caught taking a bribe or engaging in some other unethical act. His/her colleagues are asked to decide what punishment he/she should be given. They may let him/her go scot-free or decide to terminate his/her services instead of imposing a punishment which may commensurate with the unethical act he/she had engaged in. Whatever the initial position in the group, this position becomes much stronger as a result of discussions and interaction in the group.