Question

There is increasing concern about the impact of fast-food consumption on public health, particularly among children and adolescents. Studies have linked the rise in fast food consumption to higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and other diet-related health issues. To address this, many governments have implemented policies to limit the advertising of unhealthy foods to children. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that limiting food advertising to children can improve public health?

• A. Research shows that children are more likely to make healthier food choices when they are involved in food preparation at home.
• B. Health experts argue that a balanced diet and regular physical activity are more important factors in preventing obesity than food advertising alone.
• C. Studies have shown that limiting food advertising to children has been successful in other countries at improving their overall diet.
• D. Children who watch more television are also more likely to engage in sedentary behaviors, such as playing video games.
• E. Many children eat fast food regardless of advertising because of the convenience and affordability of these meals.

Hint:

To weaken an argument, look for evidence that the proposed solution does not address the main cause of the problem.

Answer 1

Answer: (E)

Step 1: Identify the core argument.
The argument claims that limiting food advertising to children can improve public health by reducing unhealthy eating habits.
Step 2: Understand what it means to weaken an argument.
A weakening statement shows that the proposed solution may not effectively address the root cause of the problem.
Step 3: Evaluate the options.
Option (A) introduces an additional health-promoting factor but does not weaken the argument.
Option (B) suggests other important factors but does not show that advertising limits are ineffective.
Option (C) strengthens the argument by showing success elsewhere.
Option (D) discusses sedentary behavior, which is tangential to advertising restrictions.
Option (E) directly weakens the argument by suggesting that children consume fast food irrespective of advertising, due to convenience and affordability.
Step 4: Final assessment.
If children eat fast food regardless of advertising, then limiting advertisements would have limited impact on improving public health.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (E)}} \]