Question:

A sports betting company argues in court that its operations are similar to those of the stock market. Like sports betting, the stock market is also unpredictable even for experts. This often results in many investors losing money. Therefore, the company contends that sports betting should also be legalized in the country. Which of the following arguments would weaken their claim?

Show Hint

To weaken an argument based on analogy, identify a key difference that makes the comparison invalid or misleading.
Updated On: Jan 14, 2026
  • Stock market investors consistently earn substantial profits over time.
  • While fewer people are familiar with the stock market, a large number of people are interested in sports.
  • Sports betting companies frequently use aggressive marketing tactics that target vulnerable populations.
  • A regulatory body exists in the country to oversee stock market operations.
  • Stock market investments are less addictive than sports betting.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identify the core argument.
The company argues by analogy that since the stock market is legal despite being unpredictable and causing losses, sports betting should also be legalized.
Step 2: Understand how to weaken an argument based on analogy.
To weaken such an argument, we must show a relevant difference between the two activities that undermines the comparison.
Step 3: Evaluate the options.
Option (A) weakens the premise slightly but does not directly address the analogy.
Option (B) is irrelevant to legality and does not affect the argument.
Option (C) criticizes marketing practices but does not directly break the comparison made.
Option (D) introduces regulation, but regulation alone does not directly address the core harm being compared.
Option (E) highlights a crucial difference: sports betting being more addictive than stock market investments makes the comparison flawed and weakens the justification for legalization.
Step 4: Final evaluation.
If sports betting is significantly more addictive than stock market investing, then treating them as equivalent activities for legal purposes is unjustified.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (E)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Data Analysis

View More Questions

Questions Asked in NMAT exam

View More Questions