There are four envelopes — E1, E2, E3 and E4 — in which one was supposed to put letters L1, L2, L3 and L4 meant for persons C1, C2, C3 and C4 respectively, but by mistake the letters got jumbled up and went in wrong envelopes. Now if C2 is allowed to open an envelope at random, then how will he identify the envelope containing the letter for him?
I. L2 has been put in E1.
II. The letter belonging to C3 has gone in the correct envelope.
Statement I tells us directly where \(L_2\) has been placed — in envelope \(E_1\). Since \(C_2\) is looking for \(L_2\), and now he knows it’s in \(E_1\), this is sufficient to answer the question. Statement II merely states that the letter belonging to \(C_3\) (i.e., \(L_3\)) is in the correct envelope \((E_3).\) But this does not help \(C_2\) in identifying where his own letter \((L_2) \)has gone. So, Statement I alone is sufficient, but Statement II alone is not.
In the two triangles, what is the value of \( P + Q + R + S \)?
I. \( A + B = 90^\circ \)
II. \( P + Q = R + S \)