The work done by a man, a woman and a child is in the ratio $3:2:1$. There are $20$ men, $30$ women and $36$ children. Their weekly wages (₹ $780$) are divided in the ratio of work done by men, women and children. What will be the wages of $15$ men, $21$ women and $30$ children for $2$ weeks?
In mixed-work wage problems, first find each group's share via (count × rate) ratios, then convert to per-head and scale by time.
₹$585$
₹$292.5$
₹$1170$
₹$900$
Group work per week is proportional to (number) × (per-head rate):
Men: $20 \times 3 = 60$, Women: $30 \times 2 = 60$, Children: $36 \times 1 = 36$.
Thus weekly group-share ratio $= 60 : 60 : 36 = 5 : 5 : 3$ (sum = 13).
One part $= \dfrac{780}{13} = ₹60$. Hence weekly group wages:
Men ₹300, Women ₹300, Children ₹180.
Per-head per week: Men ₹300/20 = 15, Women ₹300/30 = 10, Children ₹180/36 = 5.
For 2 weeks, per head: Men ₹30, Women ₹20, Children ₹10.
Therefore total for 15 men, 21 women, 30 children:
\[15 \times 30 + 21 \times 20 + 30 \times 10 = 450 + 420 + 300 = \boxed{₹1170}.\]
A shopkeeper marks his goods 40% above cost price and offers a discount of 20%. What is his overall profit percentage?
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)