Alternative Method for Differentiating Area with Respect to Circumference:
From the formula for the circumference of a circle, \( C = 2\pi r \), we can express the radius \( r \) as a function of \( C \):
\[ r = \frac{C}{2\pi} \] Substitute this into the area formula \( A = \pi r^2 \) to get the area as a function of \( C \): \[ A = \pi \left( \frac{C}{2\pi} \right)^2 = \pi \left( \frac{C^2}{4\pi^2} \right) = \frac{C^2}{4\pi} \] Now, differentiate \( A \) with respect to \( C \): \[ \frac{dA}{dC} = \frac{2C}{4\pi} = \frac{C}{2\pi} \] Substitute \( C = 2\pi r = 2\pi(4) = 8\pi \): \[ \frac{dA}{dC} = \frac{8\pi}{2\pi} = 4 \]
Final Answer: The value of \( \frac{dA}{dC} \) is 4.
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
We are asked to find the derivative of the area \( A \) with respect to the circumference \( C \), which is represented as \( \frac{dA}{dC} \). This is a related rates problem where both \( A \) and \( C \) are functions of the radius \( r \).
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Let \( A \) be the area and \( C \) be the circumference of a circle with radius \( r \).
\[ A = \pi r^2 \] \[ C = 2\pi r \] We can use the chain rule to find \( \frac{dA}{dC} \): \[ \frac{dA}{dC} = \frac{dA/dr}{dC/dr} \]
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
First, we find the derivatives of \( A \) and \( C \) with respect to \( r \):
\[ \frac{dA}{dr} = \frac{d}{dr}(\pi r^2) = 2\pi r \] \[ \frac{dC}{dr} = \frac{d}{dr}(2\pi r) = 2\pi \] Now, we can find \( \frac{dA}{dC} \) using the chain rule: \[ \frac{dA}{dC} = \frac{2\pi r}{2\pi} = r \] The problem asks for this rate of change when the radius is 4 cm.
Substituting \( r = 4 \) cm: \[ \frac{dA}{dC} = 4 \text{ cm} \] The units of this rate are area units divided by length units, which is cm\(^2\)/cm. So the result should just be cm. However, the options provided all have units cm\(^2\)/cm, which is a bit redundant but guides us to the numerical answer.
The final numerical value is 4.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The rate of change of the area with respect to its circumference is 4 cm2/cm.
Match List-I with List-II
List-I | List-II |
---|---|
(A) The minimum value of \( f(x) = (2x - 1)^2 + 3 \) | (I) 4 |
(B) The maximum value of \( f(x) = -|x + 1| + 4 \) | (II) 10 |
(C) The minimum value of \( f(x) = \sin(2x) + 6 \) | (III) 3 |
(D) The maximum value of \( f(x) = -(x - 1)^2 + 10 \) | (IV) 5 |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The marks out of 50 obtained by 100 students in a test are given below:
Marks obtained | 20 | 25 | 28 | 29 | 33 | 38 | 42 | 43 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of students | 6 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Find: \(3\text{ mode} - 2\text{ median}\)
Find the missing number from the given alternatives.
6 | 10 | 14 |
9 | 15 | 21 |
12 | 20 | ? |
The National Emblem of India has been adopted from the capital of King _______ which was situated in _______.
”The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind”
It is no use saying that we ask for separate electorates, because it is good for us. We have heard it long enough. We have heard it for years, and as a result of this agitation we are now a separate nation ... Can you show me one free country where there are separate electorates? If so, I shall be prepared to accept it. But in this unfortunate country if this separate electorate is going to be persisted in, even after the division of the country, woe betide the country; it is not worth living in. Therefore, I say, it is not for my good alone, it is for your own good that I say it, forget the past. One day, we may be united ... The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind. We do not want to perpetuate that mischief. (Hear, hear). When the British introduced this element they had not expected that they will have to go so soon. They wanted it for their easy administration. That is all right. But they have left the legacy behind. Are we to get out of it or not?
Charkha
What I object to, is the craze for machinery as such. The craze is for what they call labour-saving machinery. Men go on ”saving labour”, till thousands are without work and thrown on the open streets to die of starvation. I want to save time and labour, not for a fraction of mankind, but for all; I want the concentration of wealth, not in the hands of few, but in the hands of all. YOUNG INDIA, 13 NOVEMBER 1924 Khaddar does not seek to destroy all machinery but it does regulate its use and check its weedy growth. It uses machinery for the service of the poorest in their own cottages. The wheel is itself an exquisite piece of machinery. YOUNG INDIA, 17 MARCH 1927