We are given: \[ 0.25 \le 2x \le 200 \] Dividing through by 2: \[ 0.125 \le x \le 100 \] Since \(x\) must be an integer (based on the given possible values), the range of \(x\) satisfying the original inequality is: \[ x \in \{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\} \] (as given in the problem).
We need \( 2x + 2 \) to be divisible by **3 or 4**. Check each \(x\):
From the given statement, only \(x = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6\) were counted, but re-checking shows that actually the divisible ones are: \[ x = 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 \] That gives **5 values**.
✅ Number of values of \(x\) satisfying both conditions: 5
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)