Given the logical expression:
\[ (p \lor q) \land (q \lor (\sim r)) \]
The negation of the expression is:
\[ \sim [(p \lor q) \land (q \lor (\sim r))] \]
Using De Morgan’s laws:
\[ \sim [(p \lor q) \land (q \lor (\sim r))] = \sim (p \lor q) \lor \sim (q \lor (\sim r)) \]
Simplify \( \sim (p \lor q) \):
\[ \sim (p \lor q) = \sim p \land \sim q \]
Simplify \( \sim (q \lor (\sim r)) \):
\[ \sim (q \lor (\sim r)) = \sim q \land r \]
Combine the simplified terms using the distributive property:
\[ \sim (p \lor q) \lor \sim (q \lor (\sim r)) = (\sim p \land \sim q) \lor (\sim q \land r) \]
Rewrite using distributive properties:
\[ (\sim p \lor r) \land (\sim q) \]
The simplified negation of the given expression is:
\[ (\sim p \lor r) \land (\sim q) \]
A shop selling electronic items sells smartphones of only three reputed companies A, B, and C because chances of their manufacturing a defective smartphone are only 5%, 4%, and 2% respectively. In his inventory, he has 25% smartphones from company A, 35% smartphones from company B, and 40% smartphones from company C.
A person buys a smartphone from this shop
A shop selling electronic items sells smartphones of only three reputed companies A, B, and C because chances of their manufacturing a defective smartphone are only 5%, 4%, and 2% respectively. In his inventory, he has 25% smartphones from company A, 35% smartphones from company B, and 40% smartphones from company C.
A person buys a smartphone from this shop
(i) Find the probability that it was defective.