Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question requires identifying the statement that best summarizes the author's central argument throughout the passage. We need to find the option that aligns most closely with the author's overall thesis.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the author's main points:
- The author argues against "hard limits" and bans, calling them an "over-reaction" and "detrimental" because they "halt economic growth." This means a hard ban is counterproductive.
- The author explicitly argues for regulation in the final paragraph: "The key is imposing useful regulations that are mutually beneficial to both communities and to the proprietors of short-term rentals."
Now, let's evaluate the options based on these points:
- (A) While short-term rentals and communities would mutually benefit from regulations, a hard ban against them would be counterproductive. This statement perfectly encapsulates the two main points of the author's argument. It is a comprehensive summary of the author's position.
- (B) The passage presents short-term rentals as an alternative to hotels, not a complement. It states travelers choose them "as opposed to a traditional hotel."
- (C) The author is in favor of "useful regulations," so this statement is the opposite of their position.
- (D) This is a misreading of the last sentence. The author is arguing that communities should not see rentals as an adversary. The author would disagree with the statement as it is written.
- (E) The author suggests the industry will "continue to grow," not diminish in value.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Option (A) is the only statement that accurately and completely reflects the author's core thesis presented in the passage.