Question:

The author of the passage asserts which of the following about women reformers who tried to abolish child labor?

Show Hint

When a question asks for the author's overall assertion about a historical group, look for the most balanced and nuanced option. Historical analysis often acknowledges good intentions while critiquing flawed methods or unforeseen consequences.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
  • They alienated working-class mothers by attempting to enlist them in agitating for progressive causes.
  • They underestimated the prevalence of child labor among the working classes.
  • They were correct in their conviction that child labor was deplorable but shortsighted about the impact of child labor legislation on working-class families.
  • They were aggressive in their attempts to enforce child labor legislation, but were unable to prevent working-class families from circumventing them.
  • They were prevented by their nearly total disenfranchisement from making significant progress in child labor reform.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation


Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the author's overall assessment of the women reformers. A well-written historical analysis often avoids simple praise or condemnation, instead offering a nuanced judgment that acknowledges both strengths and weaknesses.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage is critical of the reformers, but it's unlikely to portray them as simply villainous. It presents their "oversight." This implies they had good intentions but a flawed understanding. The author's position is likely to reflect this complexity. \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A) and (D) describe specific actions but may not represent the author's overall summary assertion.} \\ \bullet & \text{(B) It's more likely they underestimated the necessity of child labor, not its prevalence.} \\ \bullet & \text{(C) This statement is perfectly balanced and nuanced. It gives the reformers credit for their moral position ("correct in their conviction that child labor was deplorable") while also identifying their critical flaw ("but shortsighted about the impact"). This captures the essence of the "oversight" that is the passage's central theme.} \\ \bullet & \text{(E) This brings in the issue of suffrage (disenfranchisement), which might be historically relevant but is not suggested as the main focus by the other questions. The focus is on class conflict, not gender-based legal status.} \\ \end{array}\]

Step 3: Final Answer:
The author's assertion is a balanced critique: the reformers' goals were noble, but their strategy was flawed because they failed to consider the unintended consequences of their proposed legislation on the families they meant to help.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions