Solution: To find the rate of formation of \( NO_2 \), we first need to determine the change in concentration of \( N_2O_4 \) over the given time period.
Initial concentration of \( N_2O_4 \): \([N_2O_4]_0 = 3 \, \text{mol L}^{-1}\)
Final concentration after 30 minutes: \([N_2O_4] = 2.75 \, \text{mol L}^{-1}\)
The change in concentration of \( N_2O_4 \) over 30 minutes is:
\[ \Delta [N_2O_4] = [N_2O_4]_0 - [N_2O_4] = 3 - 2.75 = 0.25 \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \]
According to the reaction:
\[ 2N_2O_4 \rightarrow 4NO_2 \]
For every 2 moles of \( N_2O_4 \) that decompose, 4 moles of \( NO_2 \) are formed, so the ratio is:
\[ \frac{4 \, \text{mol} \, NO_2}{2 \, \text{mol} \, N_2O_4} = 2 \]
The change in concentration of \( NO_2 \) formed is:
\[ \Delta [NO_2] = 2 \times \Delta [N_2O_4] = 2 \times 0.25 = 0.50 \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \]
The rate of formation of \( NO_2 \) over 30 minutes is:
\[ \text{Rate} = \frac{\Delta [NO_2]}{\Delta t} = \frac{0.50 \, \text{mol L}^{-1}}{30 \, \text{min}} = \frac{0.50}{30} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{min}^{-1} = \frac{1}{60} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{min}^{-1} \]
Given \( x \times 10^{-3} = \frac{1}{60} \), we can find \( x \):
\[ x = \frac{1}{60} \times 1000 = 16.67 \approx 17 \]
Thus, the value of \( x \) is: 17
Given the reaction \( 2\text{N}_2\text{O}_{5(g)} \rightarrow 4\text{NO}_{2(g)} + \text{O}_{2(g)} \), the initial concentration of \( \text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \) is \( 3 \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \) and it becomes \( 2.75 \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \) after 30 minutes. We need to find the rate of formation of \( \text{NO}_2 \) in the form \( x \times 10^{-3} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1} \) and determine the value of \( x \).
The rate of a reaction can be expressed in terms of the disappearance of a reactant or the appearance of a product. For a general reaction \( aA \rightarrow bB \), the relationship between the rates is given by: \[ -\frac{1}{a} \frac{d[A]}{dt} = +\frac{1}{b} \frac{d[B]}{dt} \] In this case, the stoichiometry of the reaction \( 2\text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \rightarrow 4\text{NO}_2 \) links the rate of decomposition of \( \text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \) to the rate of formation of \( \text{NO}_2 \). The average rate over a time interval is calculated using the change in concentration.
Step 1: Calculate the average rate of decomposition of \( \text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \).
\[ \text{Average rate of decomposition of } \text{N}_2\text{O}_5 = -\frac{\Delta [\text{N}_2\text{O}_5]}{\Delta t} = -\frac{(2.75 - 3.00) \, \text{mol L}^{-1}}{30 \, \text{min}} \] \[ = -\frac{(-0.25) \, \text{mol L}^{-1}}{30 \, \text{min}} = \frac{0.25}{30} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1} = 8.333 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1} \]
Step 2: Relate the rate of decomposition of \( \text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \) to the rate of formation of \( \text{NO}_2 \) using the reaction stoichiometry.
From the balanced equation \( 2\text{N}_2\text{O}_5 \rightarrow 4\text{NO}_2 \), the stoichiometric ratio is:
\[ \frac{\text{Rate of formation of NO}_2}{\text{Rate of decomposition of N}_2\text{O}_5} = \frac{4}{2} = 2 \]
Therefore:
\[ \text{Rate of formation of NO}_2 = 2 \times (\text{Rate of decomposition of N}_2\text{O}_5) \]
Step 3: Calculate the rate of formation of \( \text{NO}_2 \).
\[ \text{Rate of formation of NO}_2 = 2 \times (8.333 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1}) = 16.666 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1} \]
Step 4: Express the answer in the required form \( x \times 10^{-3} \) and find \( x \).
\[ \text{Rate of formation of NO}_2 = 16.666 \times 10^{-3} \approx 16.7 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{ min}^{-1} \]
Thus, the value of \( x \) is 17 (nearest integer).
Consider the following sequence of reactions : 
Molar mass of the product formed (A) is ______ g mol\(^{-1}\).

In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by: