To determine the odd sentence out, we need to identify the sentence that does not fit cohesively with the others when forming a logical paragraph. The sentences generally discuss the theme of communication among enslaved individuals as a means of resistance, and how slave-owners perceived this communication.
Sentence 1 discusses how enslaved people used talk to gain agency despite their bondage.
Sentence 2 describes the persistent and potentially rebellious nature of their communication, even in violent conditions.
Sentence 4 emphasizes that although colonials valued freedom of speech, slaves were never completely silenced, highlighting a contradiction.
Sentence 5 points out the fear that slave-owners had regarding the potential of slave communication to incite conspiracy and rebellion.
Sentence 3, meanwhile, shifts focus to the cultural context from which slaves came—societies where spoken words had spiritual connections and potency.
Therefore, Sentence 3 does not directly align with the thematic continuity focusing on the use of communication as resistance among enslaved individuals and the colonial dynamics of speech—thus, it is the odd one out.
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.
(1) When I ask the distinguished LGBTQ activist and writer Cherie Moraga whether she uses Latinx to refer to herself, she tells me, ‘I worked too hard for the “a” in Latina to give it up! I refer to myself as Xicana.’
(2) Of our accumulated ethnic population, only a third use Hispanic to identify themselves, a mere 14 percent use Latino, and less than 2 percent recognize Latinx.
(3) They have done this, although gender in languages is grammatical, not sociological or sexual, and found in linguistic families throughout the world, from French to Russian to Japanese.
(4) More recently, activists seeking to render our name gender neutral, out of respect for our LGBTQmembers, have devised yet another name for us: Latinx.
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.
(1) The effigy of a candidate establishes a personal link between him and the voters; the candidate does not only offer a programme for judgement, he suggests a physical climate, a set of daily choices expressed in a morphology, a way of dressing, a posture.
(2) Some candidates for Parliament adorn their electoral prospectus with a portrait; this presupposes that photography has a power to convert which must be analysed.
(3) Inasmuch as photography is an ellipse of language and a condensation of an ‘ineffable’ social whole, it constitutes an anti-intellectual weapon and tends to spirit away ‘politics’ (that is to say a body of problems and solutions) to the advantage of a ‘manner of being’, a socio-moral status.
(4) Photography tends to restore the paternalistic nature of elections, whose elitist essence has been disrupted by proportional representation and the rule of parties (The Right seems to use it more than the Left).
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: