Step 1: Analyzing the options.
We need to arrange the sentences logically to form a coherent paragraph. Let's examine the options: - (A) provides the introduction, stating that the garden is in Kyoto, Japan. - (B) gives details about the arrangement of rocks. - (C) provides the dimensions of the garden. - (D) describes the unique characteristic of the garden, where only 14 rocks are visible at once. - (E) gives information about the trees and rocks in the garden.
Step 2: Rearranging the sentences.
To form a meaningful paragraph, we should start with the introduction (A), then describe the rocks (B), followed by the garden's dimensions (C), then explain the special feature (D), and finish with details about trees and rocks (E).
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct order is: (A), (C), (E), (B), (D).
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{(A), (C), (E), (B), (D)} \]
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.
(1) When I ask the distinguished LGBTQ activist and writer Cherie Moraga whether she uses Latinx to refer to herself, she tells me, ‘I worked too hard for the “a” in Latina to give it up! I refer to myself as Xicana.’
(2) Of our accumulated ethnic population, only a third use Hispanic to identify themselves, a mere 14 percent use Latino, and less than 2 percent recognize Latinx.
(3) They have done this, although gender in languages is grammatical, not sociological or sexual, and found in linguistic families throughout the world, from French to Russian to Japanese.
(4) More recently, activists seeking to render our name gender neutral, out of respect for our LGBTQmembers, have devised yet another name for us: Latinx.
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.
(1) The effigy of a candidate establishes a personal link between him and the voters; the candidate does not only offer a programme for judgement, he suggests a physical climate, a set of daily choices expressed in a morphology, a way of dressing, a posture.
(2) Some candidates for Parliament adorn their electoral prospectus with a portrait; this presupposes that photography has a power to convert which must be analysed.
(3) Inasmuch as photography is an ellipse of language and a condensation of an ‘ineffable’ social whole, it constitutes an anti-intellectual weapon and tends to spirit away ‘politics’ (that is to say a body of problems and solutions) to the advantage of a ‘manner of being’, a socio-moral status.
(4) Photography tends to restore the paternalistic nature of elections, whose elitist essence has been disrupted by proportional representation and the rule of parties (The Right seems to use it more than the Left).