Comprehension

Surrogacy is defined by law as “a practice whereby one woman bears and gives birth to a child for an intending couple” and intends to hand over the child to them after the birth, as per the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (the “SRA”). The SRA restricts altruistic surrogacy to legally wedded infertile Indian couples. The couple is deemed eligible for surrogacy only if they have been married for five years. The SRA sets an age limitation for the couple. A husband must be between 26 and 55 years of age and a wife between 23 and 50 years. Further, Indian couples with biological or adopted children are prohibited from undertaking surrogacy, save for some exceptions such as mentally or physically challenged children, or those suffering from a life-threatening disorder or fatal illness. The SRA provides that the surrogate mother has to be a close relative of the couple (such as a sibling of one of the members of the couple), a married woman with a child of her own, aged between 25 and 35 years, who has been a surrogate only once in her life. Even within this category of people, commercial surrogacy is banned in India and that includes the “commercialisation of surrogacy services or procedures or its component services or component procedures”. The surrogate woman cannot be given payments, rewards, benefits or fees, “except the medical expenses and such other prescribed expenses incurred on the surrogate mother and the insurance coverage for the surrogate mother”.
A legal commentator points out some criticisms of the law. “Permitting limited conditional surrogacy to married Indian couples and disqualifying other persons on basis of nationality, marital status, sexual orientation or age does not pass the test of equality,” he writes. He adds that reproductive autonomy, inclusive of the right to procreation and parenthood is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The intending parents typically sign a contract with the surrogate. The Indian Contract Act, 1972 (the “ICA”) provides that a valid contract has to be in writing, and signed in the presence of two witnesses. The ICA also provides that a contract that is prohibited by any other law will not be valid under the ICA.
[Extracted with edits and revisions from “What laws regulate surrogacy in India”, The Indian Express]

Question: 1

Rani and Shiva would like to opt for surrogacy. They have been married for 6 years. Rani is aged 51 and Shiva is aged 53. Both Rani and Shiva have built successful business empires. They are now working together on a joint initiative. Due to the demanding nature of their work, they have not thought about children previously.
However, they are now keen to have a child via surrogacy. Are Rani and Shiva eligible for surrogacy under the SRA?

Updated On: Jul 9, 2024
  • Yes, because they have been married for more than 5 years.
  • Yes, because they have financial capacity to bring up a child.
  • No, because they do not fall within the legal requirements of intending parents.
  • No, because they are not an infertile couple.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (C): No, because they do not fall within the legal requirements of intending parents.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Assume Rani and Shiva are eligible for surrogacy under the SRA. They approach Geeta to act as a surrogate. Geeta is Rani’s sister. She is 29 years old. She is married, has one child, and has been a surrogate twice before. Which of the following statements are false?
i. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is a close relative
ii. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is married.
iii. Geeta has been a surrogate only twice before and is now eligible to be a surrogate for Rani.
iv. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is 29.

Updated On: Jul 9, 2024
  • Statement iii
  • Statements i and iii
  • Statements ii and iii
  • Statements ii, iii, and iv
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (A): Statement iii.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Joseph and Neena are keen to have a child via surrogacy. They have been married for 8 years, and have been unable to conceive biologically due to infertility. Joseph is 40 years old and Neena is 42 years old. They have an adopted daughter, Maya, who is 4 years old. Maya has been diagnosed with Striker’s Syndrome, which would cause slow neurological deterioration, with chances of death. Devastated, Joseph and Neena decide to opt for surrogacy, to become parents to their biological child. Are they eligible for surrogacy?

Updated On: Jul 9, 2024
  • Yes, because they have no biological children.
  • No, because they have an adopted child
  • Yes, because their adopted child has been diagnosed with Striker’s Syndrome.
  • Yes, because their right to procreation and parenthood is protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (C): Yes, because their adopted child has been diagnosed with Striker’s Syndrome.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

Queen runs a surrogacy clinic. She employs 54 women, aged between 25 and 35 years. They are all married women with one or more children. Most of them belong to economically disadvantaged backgrounds. They choose to be surrogates because it gives them a reliable source of income. Kishore and Noor are intending parents. They have been married 5 years, are both aged 35, and do not have children. Kishore has been certified as infertile. So, they decide to approach Queen’s clinic. They sign a contract with the surrogate. The contract is in writing and is signed in the presence of two witnesses. As per the contract, Kishore and Noor are required to remunerate the surrogate with ₹ 2 lakh per child born as a result of surrogacy, and take care of her medical needs, including providing her with medical insurance. A healthy baby girl is born as a result of surrogacy. Kishore and Noor are overjoyed. They take care of the surrogate’s medical expenses. However, they do not pay the surrogate the ₹ 2 lakh. The surrogate, supported by Queen, now wants to take Kishore and Noor to court, to demand that they make the payment.Will she succeed?

Updated On: Aug 4, 2024
  • Yes, because Kishore and Noor are bound by the contract under the ICA
  • Yes, because the intending parents and the surrogate meet the eligibility requirements under the SRA.
  • Yes, because the surrogate meets the eligibility requirements under the SRA.
  • No, because SRA allows only altruistic surrogacy, so the contract is not valid under the ICA.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (D): No, because SRA allows only altruistic surrogacy, so the contract is not valid under the ICA.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

Karan and Daniel are in a homosexual relationship. As per the Hindu Marriage Act, marriage is allowed only between heterosexual couples. As a result, Karan and Daniel are not married. However, they wish to have children and decide to go in for surrogacy. When they approach Queen’s clinic, they are informed that they do not meet the requirements for an intending couple under the SRA. Karan and Daniel wish to challenge the SRA for violating their constitutional right to non-discrimination. The non-discrimination clause under the Constitution of India reads: ‘No citizen shall be discriminated on the basis of sex, caste, religion, nationality, place of birth or any other ground’. Karan and Daniel argue that the SRA discriminates against them on the basis of sexual orientation, because it restricts surrogacy to heterosexual couples alone. Which of the following arguments would most strongly support their claim in court?

Updated On: Jul 9, 2024
  • The non-discrimination clause does not explicitly mention sexual orientation
  • Discrimination on the basis of sex could include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
  • The non-discrimination clause is not restricted to explicitly mentioned grounds.
  • Surrogacy is restricted under the SRA to married couples, and only heterosexual couples can get married.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (C): The non-discrimination clause is not restricted to explicitly mentioned grounds.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Current Legal Affairs

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions