Question:
What does the term "voir dire" refer to in legal proceedings?
What does the term "voir dire" refer to in legal proceedings?
Show Hint
"Voir dire" is an essential process in the courtroom that ensures the fairness of the trial by selecting an unbiased jury.
Updated On: May 26, 2025
- The presentation of evidence
- The examination of victims
- The process of selecting a jury
- The closing arguments by attorneys
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
In legal proceedings, the term "voir dire" refers to the process of jury selection. It involves questioning potential jurors to determine if they are fit to serve on the jury, ensuring there are no biases or conflicts of interest that would affect their impartiality. The other options refer to different parts of a legal trial.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Definition:
The term "voir dire" is a legal phrase derived from French, meaning "to speak the truth." In the context of legal proceedings, it refers to the process of selecting a jury before a trial begins.
Purpose of Voir Dire:
The main objective of voir dire is to ensure that jurors selected for a trial are impartial and unbiased. During this process, the judge and the attorneys for both parties ask potential jurors a series of questions to determine whether they can fairly decide the case based on the evidence presented and the law as instructed by the judge.
Process:
- Potential jurors are called into court and placed under oath to answer questions truthfully.
- Attorneys may ask questions about the jurors’ backgrounds, beliefs, relationships, employment, and any possible biases.
- Based on responses, attorneys may use two types of challenges:
1. Peremptory challenge: Dismissing a juror without giving a reason (limited in number).
2. Challenge for cause: Dismissing a juror for a specific reason, such as demonstrated bias or conflict of interest.
Importance in Legal Proceedings:
Voir dire is a critical part of a fair trial. It helps ensure that the final jury is composed of individuals who can consider the case objectively, fairly, and in accordance with the law, free from preconceived notions or personal interests.
Conclusion:
In legal proceedings, "voir dire" refers to the process of selecting a jury, aimed at identifying and eliminating bias to ensure a fair and impartial trial.
The term "voir dire" is a legal phrase derived from French, meaning "to speak the truth." In the context of legal proceedings, it refers to the process of selecting a jury before a trial begins.
Purpose of Voir Dire:
The main objective of voir dire is to ensure that jurors selected for a trial are impartial and unbiased. During this process, the judge and the attorneys for both parties ask potential jurors a series of questions to determine whether they can fairly decide the case based on the evidence presented and the law as instructed by the judge.
Process:
- Potential jurors are called into court and placed under oath to answer questions truthfully.
- Attorneys may ask questions about the jurors’ backgrounds, beliefs, relationships, employment, and any possible biases.
- Based on responses, attorneys may use two types of challenges:
1. Peremptory challenge: Dismissing a juror without giving a reason (limited in number).
2. Challenge for cause: Dismissing a juror for a specific reason, such as demonstrated bias or conflict of interest.
Importance in Legal Proceedings:
Voir dire is a critical part of a fair trial. It helps ensure that the final jury is composed of individuals who can consider the case objectively, fairly, and in accordance with the law, free from preconceived notions or personal interests.
Conclusion:
In legal proceedings, "voir dire" refers to the process of selecting a jury, aimed at identifying and eliminating bias to ensure a fair and impartial trial.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Current Legal Affairs
- The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 that has provision for up to five years' imprisonment and a fine of up to 1 crore for malpractices and organized cheating in government recruitment exams was notified by the Union government and came into effect from June 21, 2024. The Bill had received assent from the President of India on the 13th February 2024. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 mentions punishments for "leakage of question paper or answer key", "directly or indirectly assisting the candidate in any manner unauthorisedly in the public examination" and "tampering with the computer network or a computer resource or a computer system" as offences done by a person, group of persons or institutions. Besides these, "creation of fake website to cheat or for monetary gain", "conduct of fake examination, issuance of fake admit cards or offer letters to cheat or for monetary gain" and "manipulation in seating arrangements, allocation of dates and shifts for the candidates to facilitate adopting unfair means in examinations" are also among the offences punishable under the law.
"Any person or persons resorting to unfair means and offences under this Act shall be punished with imprisonment for a term not less than three years but which may extend to five years and with fine up to 10 lakh," said the Act. A service provider, engaged by the public examination authority for conduct of examinations, shall also be liable to be punished with imposition of a fine up to 1 crore "and proportionate cost of examination shall also be recovered" from it, according to the Act. Such service providers shall also be barred from being assigned with any responsibility for the conduct of any public examination for a period of four years.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions from "Act that Punishes Organized Cheating in Government Exams Comes into Effect" published in The Hindu dated 22-06-2024]- CLAT - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Current Legal Affairs
- There are some advantages of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA), 2023. For instance, for the first time, personal data belonging to or identifying children will have to be classified separately, with such data carrying a greater degree of security and privacy. The law also seeks to reduce the rate and impact of data breaches targeting Indian businesses. The Digital Personal Data Protection law, however, goes a step beyond by imposing penalties for cases where data is breached as a result of a lack of implementation of adequate security controls. However, it could be said that the law isn’t balanced, because it provides wide exemptions to the processing of personal data to the government. For instance, data can be processed “in the interest of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of any offence … in India.” These kinds of exemptions are dangerous as they stand to legitimise widespread and unwarranted collection of data under the guise that such collection and processing may ultimately be useful for preventing or deterring a crime.
Security agencies will have significant authority to collect and retain any data whatsoever, as is typically the case with exemptions relating to the maintenance of sovereignty, integrity, security of the state, preservation of public order, prevention of offences, and incitement to commit offences. The law also exempts processing of personal data held outside of India. The government is also exempt from being required to delete any data that it possesses, regardless of the purpose it may have been collected for, on the request of an individual, or by way of a prescribed data retention period.
The government is not bound by purpose limitations, allowing data collected for one specified purpose be used for a new, incompatible purpose, which stands in contrast to the regulations imposed on businesses.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions from “Digital Personal Data Protection Law Raises Questions About Consistency with Right to Privacy Ruling” published in The Wire dated 22-08-2023]- CLAT - 2024
- Legal Studies
- Current Legal Affairs
- In India, the legal landscape surrounding online defamation is a subject of significant interest and debate. With the rise of social media, and online platforms, cases of online defamation have become increasingly common. Defamation refers to making false statements about someone that harm their reputation. Online defamation includes defamatory statements made on the internet, including social media, blogs, forums, and other online platforms.
One critical aspect of online defamation is determining the liability of intermediaries, such as social media platforms or websites, for defamatory content posted by users. Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, provides a safe harbor for intermediaries, stating that they are not liable for third-party content if they act as intermediaries and follow due diligence in removing or disabling access to the content once notified.
However, determining whether an intermediary has fulfilled its due diligence obligations can be complex. The Indian judiciary has been actively interpreting this provision. One significant case is the Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, in which the Supreme Court clarified that intermediaries are required to act upon a valid court order or government directive for content removal, not upon private complaints.
The court also emphasized that the intermediaries should not take a proactive role in monitoring content, as this could potentially infringe on free speech. While the law provides a safe harbor, it does not absolve intermediaries from their responsibilities.
Online defamation cases often involve a balancing act between the right to freedom of expression and the right to reputation. The Indian legal system requires a careful examination of the content, context, and intent of the statements to determine whether they qualify as defamatory. Additionally, the plaintiff in an online defamation case must prove that the statement was false, damaging to their reputation, and made with a degree of fault, such as negligence or actual malice.- CLAT - 2024
- Legal Studies
- Current Legal Affairs
- Who is the current Secretary General of the United Nations?
- TS LAWCET - 2023
- Legal Studies
- Current Legal Affairs
- Surrogacy is defined by law as “a practice whereby one woman bears and gives birth to a child for an intending couple” and intends to hand over the child to them after the birth, as per the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (the “SRA”). The SRA restricts altruistic surrogacy to legally wedded infertile Indian couples. The couple is deemed eligible for surrogacy only if they have been married for five years. The SRA sets an age limitation for the couple. A husband must be between 26 and 55 years of age and a wife between 23 and 50 years. Further, Indian couples with biological or adopted children are prohibited from undertaking surrogacy, save for some exceptions such as mentally or physically challenged children, or those suffering from a life-threatening disorder or fatal illness. The SRA provides that the surrogate mother has to be a close relative of the couple (such as a sibling of one of the members of the couple), a married woman with a child of her own, aged between 25 and 35 years, who has been a surrogate only once in her life. Even within this category of people, commercial surrogacy is banned in India and that includes the “commercialisation of surrogacy services or procedures or its component services or component procedures”. The surrogate woman cannot be given payments, rewards, benefits or fees, “except the medical expenses and such other prescribed expenses incurred on the surrogate mother and the insurance coverage for the surrogate mother”.
A legal commentator points out some criticisms of the law. “Permitting limited conditional surrogacy to married Indian couples and disqualifying other persons on basis of nationality, marital status, sexual orientation or age does not pass the test of equality,” he writes. He adds that reproductive autonomy, inclusive of the right to procreation and parenthood is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The intending parents typically sign a contract with the surrogate. The Indian Contract Act, 1972 (the “ICA”) provides that a valid contract has to be in writing, and signed in the presence of two witnesses. The ICA also provides that a contract that is prohibited by any other law will not be valid under the ICA.
[Extracted with edits and revisions from “What laws regulate surrogacy in India”, The Indian Express]- CLAT - 2023
- Legal Studies
- Current Legal Affairs
View More Questions
Questions Asked in TS LAWCET exam
- Maximum period for which a woman is entitled for maternity benefit is
- TS LAWCET - 2024
- Labour & Industrial Law
- Find the missing number in the series: 387924, ?, 3724, 423, 32, 2
- TS LAWCET - 2024
- Sequence and Series
- How many countries are currently members of the United Nations?
- TS LAWCET - 2024
- United Nations and its Organizations
- A gold ring is 58.33% pure, its purity can be alternatively shown as ________ .
- TS LAWCET - 2024
- Metal Casting
- Which one of the following is not a member of the Quad group of nations?
- TS LAWCET - 2024
- International Organizations
View More Questions