Statements: Some ants are parrots. All the parrots are apples.
Conclusions: (1) All the apples are parrots. (2) Some ants are apples.
Let's analyze the statements and conclusions:
1. "Some ants are parrots" means there is a partial overlap between ants and parrots. This does not imply that all ants are parrots.
2. "All the parrots are apples" means every parrot is an apple, but it doesn't mean that all apples are parrots (because there might be apples that are not parrots). Now, let's look at the conclusions:
Conclusion (1): "All the apples are parrots." This is incorrect. We only know that all parrots are apples, not the reverse.
Conclusion (2): "Some ants are apples." This conclusion is correct. Since some ants are parrots, and all parrots are apples, it follows that some ants are apples.
Thus, only conclusion (2) follows.
In the given figure, how many huts are covered and muddy?
A closed-loop system has the characteristic equation given by: $ s^3 + k s^2 + (k+2) s + 3 = 0 $.
For the system to be stable, the value of $ k $ is:
A digital filter with impulse response $ h[n] = 2^n u[n] $ will have a transfer function with a region of convergence.