Question

Should right to primary education be made a fundamental right?

• A. Argument I is strong
• B. Argument II is strong
• C. Both I and II are strong
• D. Both I and II are weak

Hint:

When judging strong arguments, always check if they align with fundamental constitutional or developmental goals.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Argument I
Argument I — "We should first complete other development projects, education of children may wait."
This is weak because delaying education for children has long-term negative consequences on literacy, skill development, and socio-economic growth.
It also contradicts the idea of inclusive development, which requires simultaneous focus on education and other sectors.
Step 2: Argument II
Argument II — "Yes, without primary education for all there cannot be inclusive development."
This is strong because education is the foundation for skilled manpower, informed citizenship, and socio-economic equality.
If primary education is not guaranteed, the cycle of poverty continues, and other development measures will not reach their full potential.
Step 3: Conclusion
Only Argument II directly supports the need to make primary education a fundamental right.
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Option: (b) Argument II is strong}} \]