The passage states that in the ninth century, France created the royal office of the Luparii, or wolf-catchers, to handle the wolf problem. However, this office became unnecessary once the last wolf was killed. Therefore, the resurgence of wolves can't be blamed on the office shutting down.
Other options provide clearer explanations:
Option A: The protected status of wolves in Europe, which makes hunting them illegal except for occasional state-sanctioned culls, and efforts by NGOs to track and count them, also contribute to their recovery.
Option B: Rural depopulation is a factor. For example, in Lozère, the population dropped from over 140,000 in the mid-19th century to fewer than 80,000 today as farming and mining declined.
Option D: As humans withdraw, forests are expanding. From 1990 to 2015, France's forest cover increased by 102,000 hectares per year, with nearly one-third of mainland France now covered by woodland.
The correct option is (C): The shutting down of the royal office of the Luparii.
Residents of Lozère, a hilly area in southern France, share common rural complaints. In remote villages like Le Bacon and Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about the lack of local schools, jobs, and phone and internet connections. Farmers are also worried about the return of wolves, which were eradicated from France last century but are now gradually returning to the forests and hills. Francis Palombi, an aspiring parliamentarian, addressed this issue during an election campaign, saying, "The wolf must be taken in hand." While tourists enjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, farmers are concerned about their livestock and livelihoods.
Options B, C, and D can be clearly inferred from this paragraph:
The passage also mentions that while many people still hold hunting licenses, few actively hunt. Therefore, Option A, which states there is a decline in the number of hunting licenses, is incorrect.
To weaken the author's claim, we need to identify a statement that challenges the assertions or implications made in the passage. The author discusses the return of wolves to Lozère, noting:
An effective way to undermine these points is by presenting consequences of wolf return that contradict the author's optimistic view, especially regarding tourism.
The statement "Wolf attacks on tourists in Lozère are on the rise" directly challenges the third point. If wolves pose a danger to tourists, this would deter visitors, leading to a negative economic and social impact, thereby weakening the author's positive portrayal of tourism potential.
Conclusion: This statement introduces a serious concern that the author overlooks, making it a strong contender to weaken the overall argument.
"As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolves seen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those who celebrate the predators' return. Farmers' losses are real, but are not the only economic story. Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals' spread is discussed, also generate income and jobs in rural areas."
The passage mentions that farmers in Lozère are worried about wolves returning and causing livestock losses. Meanwhile, environmentalists see wolves as a sign of broader ecological health. The proposed economic solution involves creating tourist attractions related to wolves, like parks. These attractions help address farmers' economic concerns by generating income and align with environmentalists' interests in the return of wolves. Therefore, Option D accurately reflects the collaboration between farmers and environmentalists in the proposed solution.
Directions: There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and decide where (Option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.
Sentence: This philosophical cut at one's core beliefs, values, and way of life is difficult enough.
Paragraph:
The experience of reading philosophy is often disquieting. When reading philosophy, the values around which one has heretofore organised one's life may come to look provincial, flatly wrong, or even evil. __(1)__ When beliefs previously held as truths are rendered implausible, new beliefs, values, and ways of living may be required. __(2)__ What's worse, philosophers admonish each other to remain unsutured until such time as a defensible new answer is revealed or constructed. Sometimes philosophical writing is even strictly critical in that it does not even attempt to provide an alternative after tearing down a cultural or conceptual citadel. __(3)__ The reader of philosophy must be prepared for the possibility of this experience. While reading philosophy can help one clarify one's values, and even make one self-conscious for the first time of the fact that there are good reasons for believing what one believes, it can also generate Un remediated doubt that is difficult to live with.
The given sentence, "This philosophical cut at one's core beliefs, values, and way of life is difficult enough.", fits best at Option 2 in the paragraph. Here's the explanation:
The sentence describes the challenging nature of philosophical exploration—a theme that is presented right after discussing the possibility of old beliefs being rendered implausible. Here is how the paragraph is structured with the inserted sentence:
The experience of reading philosophy is often disquieting. When reading philosophy, the values around which one has heretofore organised one's life may come to look provincial, flatly wrong, or even evil. When beliefs previously held as truths are rendered implausible, new beliefs, values, and ways of living may be required. This philosophical cut at one's core beliefs, values, and way of life is difficult enough. What's worse, philosophers admonish each other to remain unsutured until such time as a defensible new answer is revealed or constructed. Sometimes philosophical writing is even strictly critical in that it does not even attempt to provide an alternative after tearing down a cultural or conceptual citadel. The reader of philosophy must be prepared for the possibility of this experience. While reading philosophy can help one clarify one's values, and even make one self-conscious for the first time of the fact that there are good reasons for believing what one believes, it can also generate unremediated doubt that is difficult to live with.
Thus, the insertion at Option 2 succinctly connects the preceding and following ideas regarding the unsettling impact of philosophical reading.
Democracy, often hailed as the most equitable form of governance, is a system where power ultimately rests in the hands of the people. The word derives from the Greek words ”demos” meaning people and ”kratos” meaning power or rule. Democracy aims to provide equal political participation and protect the individual freedoms of all citizens. However, while the idea of democracy is simple, its practice is frequently complex and fraught with challenges. At its core, democracy functions on the principle of majority rule, yet it simultaneously guarantees the protection of minority rights.
This balance ensures that while the majority has the power to make decisions through voting, the fundamental rights of minorities are not trampled upon. Such a system requires consistent vigilance and respect for the rule of law. Without these, democracies can devolve into majoritarian tyranny or authoritarianism. The practice of democracy is not merely limited to voting in elections. It encompasses freedom of speech, an independent judiciary, free press, and protection of individual rights. These elements together create a political environment where citizens can express dissent, hold leaders accountable, and participate actively in decision-making. When any component is weakened, the democratic process becomes vulnerable.
In recent times, democratic societies worldwide have grappled with new challenges. The rise of misinformation and fake news has eroded public trust in institutions and polarized societies. Social media platforms, meant to facilitate communication, have sometimes amplified divisive narratives and falsehoods. This has resulted in voter manipulation and a growing skepticism toward democratic processes. Literacy in media and critical thinking is increasingly vital to safeguard democracy from such threats. Economic inequality poses another significant challenge. While democracy promises equal rights politically, vast disparities in wealth and opportunity undermine this ideal.
This phenomenon raises questions about whether democracy is achievable without addressing socioeconomic inequalities. Furthermore, the involvement of citizens is crucial. Democracy requires that people are informed, engaged, and willing to participate beyond casting votes. Civic education and awareness campaigns play an essential role in nurturing responsible citizenship. Apathy or disengagement weakens the democratic fabric, opening avenues for corruption and other dangers to the system. In conclusion, democracy thrives on the collective responsibility of governments and citizens to protect its pillars and ensure inclusive, fair governance.
| The Rule of Law by Tom Bingham | Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? by Michael J. Sandel | Letters to a Law Student by Nicholas J. McBride |
|---|---|---|
| In The Rule of Law, former Lord Chief Justice Tom Bingham explores how the principle of legality underpins modern democratic life. He defines the rule of law as more than just adherence to formal rules; it is the assurance that power is exercised within clear, fair, and publicly known boundaries. Bingham distills the concept into eight principles, including equality before the law, access to justice, and respect for fundamental human rights. Drawing on cases and historical examples, he warns that national security and administrative efficiency must never override the rights of individuals. The book bridges legal philosophy and practice, arguing that law must be both predictable and humane. For Bingham, the rule of law represents a moral ideal, one that sustains public trust in justice and curbs arbitrary governance. | Michael Sandel’s Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? examines moral reasoning in law and politics. Through examples like price gouging, affirmative action, and taxation, Sandel invites readers to explore competing notions of fairness. He engages with philosophical traditions such as utilitarianism, libertarianism, and Rawlsian egalitarianism, showing that questions of justice cannot be separated from questions of virtue and the common good. Sandel rejects the idea of a morally “neutral” legal system, arguing that public deliberation about values is essential to democracy. Ultimately, he argues that a just society is one that cultivates civic responsibility, not merely individual rights. | Nicholas McBride’s Letters to a Law Student is a practical and reflective guide for aspiring lawyers. Written as a series of letters to a student beginning law school, it explores what legal study truly involves. This includes mastering case analysis, understanding precedents, and developing critical reasoning. McBride distinguishes between knowing the law and thinking like a lawyer, the latter requiring analytical discipline and ethical awareness. He emphasizes that good lawyers combine intellectual rigor with moral judgment and clarity of expression. Beyond academic success, the book urges students to reflect on law’s purpose, balancing order, justice, and compassion in human affairs. |
Urban gardening has become increasingly popular as a means to address food security, sustainability, and mental well-being in cities. By growing their own fruits, vegetables, and herbs, individuals can reduce their reliance on commercial supply chains that contribute to extensive transportation, energy consumption, and synthetic chemical use. In addition to providing fresh, nutritious food, urban gardening also contributes to environmental sustainability by mitigating urban heat island effects, improving air quality, and managing water runoff. Furthermore, it offers psychological benefits, including reduced stress, improved mood, and a sense of accomplishment. Despite its many benefits, urban gardening faces challenges like space limitations, poor soil quality, and inadequate sunlight, which gardeners overcome using innovative techniques such as vertical farming and hydroponics.