Step 1: Identify Raghubir’s Concern
Raghubir is worried about whether his current SUV will still be usable once stricter emission norms arrive.
He needs reassurance that owning and using his non-compliant SUV will still be practically acceptable for some more time.
Step 2: Evaluate the Options
- Option 1: Tier-two cities may still allow SUVs, but this is indirect and not specific to his own city.
- Option 2: Other old SUVs in his city do not guarantee legal protection — it’s only observational.
- Option 3: Being a doctor with law enforcement officials as patients is irrelevant and unethical as justification.
- Option 4: Lawyer friends in his city recently purchased non-compliant SUVs → strong evidence that such vehicles will still be usable locally, easing his worry. ✅
- Option 5: Mechanic’s assurance is unreliable and not authoritative.
Step 3: Logical Conclusion
Option 4 gives the strongest reassurance because it shows that knowledgeable professionals (lawyers) in his own city are still confident enough to buy non-compliant SUVs.
This directly reduces his fear about being barred from using his SUV immediately.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{Option (D): Lawyer friends in his city recently bought non-compliant SUVs.}}
\]
Step 1: Identify the Core Challenge
Anya wants to reduce her father’s SUV usage without creating resistance. Thus, the solution must be gentle, acceptable, and non-confrontational.
Step 2: Evaluate the Options
- Option 1: Taking away the SUV and replacing it with another SUV → drastic and confrontational; not acceptable.
- Option 2: Requesting use of public transport → unlikely to succeed, as older individuals often resist sudden lifestyle changes.
- Option 3: Secretary ferrying him daily → subtle, convenient, and saves fuel. Since weekends remain open, it avoids strong resistance. ✅
- Option 4: Gifting a small petrol car and selling the SUV → drastic, may cause emotional resistance.
- Option 5: Retrofitting with CNG kit → eco-friendly, but does not reduce SUV usage; only modifies fuel type.
Step 3: Logical Conclusion
Option 3 provides a practical and acceptable compromise — it reduces daily SUV usage while still leaving Raghubir the freedom to use it occasionally, thereby avoiding conflict.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (C): Secretary ferries him daily, except weekends.}} \]
Step 1: Identify the Key Influences
Raghubir wants to buy an EV immediately. Hence, the strongest factors will be those that are practical, immediate, and aligned with his needs:
Step 2: Arrange in Decreasing Order of Influence
From strongest to weakest influence: \[ Q \;>\; T \;>\; P \;>\; S \;>\; R \]
Step 3: Match with Options
This sequence matches Option 2: QTPSR.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (B): QTPSR}} \]
Match the following airlines with the countries where they are headquartered.
Airlines | Countries |
---|---|
1. AirAsia | A. Singapore |
2. AZAL | B. South Korea |
3. Jeju Air | C. Azerbaijan |
4. Indigo | D. India |
5. Tigerair | E. Malaysia |
Match the following authors with their respective works.
Authors | Books |
---|---|
1. Andy Weir | A. Dune |
2. Cixin Liu | B. The Time Machine |
3. Stephen Hawking | C. The Brief History of Time |
4. HG Wells | D. The Martian |
5. Frank Herbert | E. The Three Body Problem |