Comprehension
Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.
A2Z is a state-funded leading engineering college in the country, renowned for its teaching and placements. Now, A2Z aspires to be a global leader in research as well. A2Z has, therefore, decided to push for better quality research from its newly recruited faculty members. In the past, a few faculty members were confirmed because of their exceptional teaching feedback even though their research output was below par. Currently, the Dean, in consultation with the academic council, has included the quality of research as a mandatory requirement along with teaching excellence for the confirmation of the newly recruited faculty members. (The academic council comprises of the senior faculty members from different departments.)
Initially, newly recruited faculty members are put on a probation for three years. Either they are confirmed or their probation is extended or their services are terminated, based on teaching and research contributions. Once confirmed, their job is secure along with other additional perquisites.
Aparna joined the social sciences department of A2Z two years back. She is amongst the many faculty members, recruited after the new norms for confirmation were introduced. She completed her doctorate from a reputed university in the USA, with a significant research contribution. However, after joining A2Z, Aparna got deeply involved in social outreach as COVID-19 was spreading. Though her social outreach has given her immense satisfaction, she has nothing to show against research contributions; further, it has impacted her teaching effectiveness. Her confirmation is due in a year.
Question: 1

The Dean, during the annual appraisal of Aparna, realizes that her research contribution needs considerable investment of time and efforts. He is concerned that her performance could set a wrong precedent for the new faculty recruits. The dean wants to communicate to the new faculty recruits that research contribution is critical.
Which of the following actions will BEST help the Dean in achieving the objective, while being fair to Aparna?

Updated On: Aug 22, 2025
  • Extend Aparna’s probation period by an additional year, while reminding her about the research and teaching contributions needed for confirmation
  • Appreciate Aparna’s social outreach, but advise her to focus on research and teaching contributions as they are essential for confirmation
  • Increase her teaching and research requirements, while extending her probation period by two years
  • Suggest Aparna to start looking for a new job in the time available to her
  • Exhort Aparna to suspend her social outreach activities till the end of her probation, and to focus on research and teaching instead
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The Dean must balance fairness to Aparna with the need to send a strong message to the new faculty recruits that research contribution is essential.

  • Option 1: Only extends probation. This delays the issue without addressing the importance of research. 
  • Option 3: Increases pressure unfairly. This is too harsh and counterproductive.
  • Option 4: Suggesting Aparna to leave disregards her contributions and is not fair.
  • Option 5: Asking her to suspend social work undermines her valuable outreach activities.

Option 2 is the most balanced choice. It recognizes Aparna’s social outreach (fairness) while firmly reminding her that research and teaching are the core requirements for confirmation. This also sets the correct example for new recruits.

✅ Therefore, Option 2 is the most appropriate action.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

One year on, Aparna continues with her social work. Gradually, she gets closer to the end of her probation and she has not much to show against her teaching and research contributions. However, her social work has been widely appreciated by the local media. The Chief Minister of the state wants Aparna to take a larger role in social outreach and assist the government. The Dean is afraid that not confirming Aparna might prompt her to leave the institution, sending a wrong signal to the outside world. However, he also wants to send a message to the newly joined faculty members that teaching and research contributions are essential for confirmation.
Which of the following actions by the Dean is the MOST sustainable given the circumstances?

Updated On: Aug 22, 2025
  • Offer Aparna a five-year contractual position after which she has to leave irrespective of her contributions
  • Offer to create a non-teaching position of outreach officer for Aparna, but terminate her from the teaching position
  • Extend Aparna’s probation by three years, and tell her that she would have to leave if her research and teaching do not improve in that period
  • Confirm Aparna, but freeze her increments and promotions until her research contributions are as per the expected standards
  • Declare that Aparna’s extraordinary achievement deserves to be treated exceptionally, and confirm her
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Core Conflict 
- Aparna excels in social work but underperforms in research and teaching. - The Dean must balance institutional standards (teaching & research are essential) with external reputation (Aparna has political and media recognition). - A sustainable action is required, avoiding both favoritism and rigidity.

Step 2: Evaluate Options
- Option 1: Five-year contract then exit — inflexible, sends a negative message, not sustainable. 
- Option 2: Outreach officer role — removes her from academics, but creates precedent of creating special roles, unsustainable. 
- Option 3: Extend probation by three years with clear conditions — balanced, fair, allows Aparna time to improve while upholding standards. ✅ 
- Option 4: Confirm with frozen increments — weakens standards; sends a wrong message to new faculty that confirmation can happen without research. 
- Option 5: Exceptional confirmation — favoritism, undermines credibility of academic evaluation. 
 

Step 3: Conclusion
The most sustainable solution is to extend Aparna’s probation. It reassures external stakeholders of fairness, while also preserving the academic integrity of the institute.

Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (C): Extend probation by three years with clear teaching & research requirements.}} \]

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

A few months later, Aparna, during an interview with the local media, inadvertently expresses her fear that she might be let go by A2Z because she has not met its teaching and research requirements. Consequently, the academic council urges the Dean to review the faculty confirmation policy. The Dean, however, believes that any change in the policy will be a setback to the institute’s aspirations of becoming a global leader in research.
Which of the following actions by the Dean will be the MOST appropriate, given the circumstances?

Updated On: Aug 22, 2025
  • Confirm Aparna, but ask her to issue a public statement, acknowledging the importance A2Z gives to research contributions
  • Tell Aparna that she is being let go for insulting the college on a public platform
  • Confirm Aparna, but make it clear that her future promotions will be tied to her research contribution and teaching feedback
  • Convey to Aparna that the institute is eager to retain her; however, emphasize that she should focus on research to get confirmed
  • Give an interview to a local newspaper and share Aparna’s lack of research and poor teaching feedback
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identify the Core Conflict 
- Aparna has publicly expressed doubts about meeting research and teaching requirements. - The council wants flexibility, but the Dean believes policy change will harm A2Z’s research leadership goals. Thus, the Dean needs to balance faculty support with institutional standards.

Step 2: Evaluate Options
- Option 1: Confirming Aparna despite shortcomings undermines research standards. A public statement doesn’t solve the problem. 
- Option 2: Letting her go immediately for her statement is harsh, retaliatory, and harms reputation. 
- Option 3: Confirming her now but tying promotions to research weakens entry-level standards — a poor precedent. 
- Option 4: Best approach — reassures Aparna of the institute’s intent to retain her, but emphasizes research contribution as a must for confirmation. ✔️ 
- Option 5: Publicly criticizing Aparna is unprofessional and damages institutional credibility. 
 

Step 3: Logical Conclusion
The Dean should neither dilute institutional standards nor act harshly. Option 4 balances compassion with academic rigor: retain talent, but reinforce that confirmation depends on research performance.

Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (D): Retain Aparna with reassurance, but emphasize research focus for confirmation.}} \]

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions