Step 1: Identify the Core Issue
Biswas resents teachers’ influence and is searching for an opportunity to justify reducing their salaries. However, the justification must not appear personal — it must be supported by strong external factors that would convince the trustees.
Step 2: Analyze the Options
- (A) Teachers’ demands → does not justify salary reduction, only refusal of increment.
- (B) Enrollment fall → partially valid, but trustees will focus on how to improve admissions, not cut teachers’ salaries.
- (C) Competing schools paying less → weak argument; trustees prefer retaining talent.
- (D) Budget deficit → general reason, but not specific enough to justify a 20% reduction in salaries.
- (E) Parent complaints about high fees → strong justification, as trustees would prioritize keeping parents satisfied and ensuring financial sustainability.
Step 3: Logical Justification
The strongest case Biswas can present is that parents are demanding cost-cutting. Trustees are directly accountable to parents (since they pay the fees). Thus, aligning salary reduction with parent concerns provides the most persuasive argument.
Step 4: Conclusion
The BEST enabling factor for Biswas’s proposal is option (E): parent complaints about high fees and the need to cut costs.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Parents have begun complaining about high fees and demand cost-cutting.}} \]
RC -- Main Idea Passage:
Human decision-making relies on cognitive shortcuts known as heuristics. While these shortcuts allow rapid decisions in uncertain situations, they also cause predictable errors. Understanding how heuristics shape judgment can help in designing better decision-making environments.
What is the main idea?
Reading Comprehension -- Inference Passage:
Introducing new technology in workplaces often fails not because it is inefficient but because it disrupts informal social norms that shape cooperation and workflow. Workers resist changes that alter these unwritten norms even when the technology itself may be superior.
Q: Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
Passage:
Many economists argue that economic growth alone cannot guarantee well-being. While GDP may rise, factors like inequality, environmental degradation, and social alienation can worsen simultaneously. Thus, policy focus must move toward holistic indicators that measure quality of life rather than simply economic output.
Question:
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?