Question

Should Bhola still think of doing business?

• A. Yes, where there is a will, there is a way.
• B. No, saving the Earth for our children is more important than earning money.
• C. Yes, Bhola should do business while ensuring no environmental damage is done.
• D. Yes, but only if the government puts strict environment regulations in place.
• E. Bhola should stop thinking about such a dilemma.
• A. Stop environmental degradation by stopping the developmental activities.
• B. Forget about the environment; think about the people as they are the vote banks for politicians to come back to power.
• C. Suggest that the government should try to promote eco-tourism, which would be controlled and regulated by the government, as the government could think about the welfare of majority of stakeholders.
• D. Suggest that the government should promote eco-tourism with public private partnership with the involvement of NGOs, so that there are checks and balances for inefficiencies and promotion for synergetic efforts between government and private entrepreneurs.
• J. Involvement of impartial entities like NGOs who would provide a fair assessment of the policies.
• A. Charge environmental cess from all businesses operating out of Himalayas.
• B. Charge cess from anyone who pollutes the environment, be it citizens or industries and reward those who have contributed to afforestation the most.
• C. All profit making organizations have to take responsibility of afforestation proportionate to their profitability.
• D. Think about maximising the revenues and forget about the environment.
• O. Institute a Green Valley Reward, which would be given to businesses highly active in afforestation efforts.
• A. Accuse the opposition of having vested interests as the opposition leaders were denied licences for opening new hotels.
• B. Point out the improvement in environment since the implementation of pro-environment policies.
• C. Compare the unemployment levels since the implementation of the pro-environment policies and if they are less, accuse the opposition of making baseless charges.
• D. Point out that this government had initiated a regular cleaning-up drive and the opposition did not consider the data regarding the people who were employed in that drive.
• T. Call the charges as baseless accusations being used to malign the good work he had done.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Understand the dilemma.
Bhola wants to become an entrepreneur, but he is disturbed by the increasing environmental destruction in the Himalayas. His dilemma is clear: if he starts a business, he may add to environmental problems, but if he avoids business, he will not earn a livelihood or contribute to society.
Step 2: Identify the balanced path.
Guruji’s guidance highlights that the solution is not about choosing either development or environment but finding a balance. The best approach is to allow development while ensuring environmental responsibility.
Step 3: Evaluate the options.
- Option A is too vague. It only talks about willpower and ignores the environmental issue.
- Option B is extreme because it prioritizes only the environment and ignores Bhola’s need for livelihood.
- Option C is the most suitable because it allows Bhola to pursue business while making sure no environmental damage is done.
- Option D depends only on the government and shifts Bhola’s responsibility.
- Option E is impractical because it asks Bhola to stop thinking about the issue without providing a solution.
Step 4: Conclude.
The most balanced and practical solution is that Bhola should do business, but he must ensure that no environmental damage takes place. \[ \boxed{\text{Yes, Bhola should do business while ensuring no environmental damage is done.}} \]

Answer 2

Step 1: Understand the problem.
The case is about balancing tourism development with environmental conservation. Bhola wants to recommend a tourism policy to the government that ensures sustainable development without ignoring economic benefits.
Step 2: Key requirement.
The best alternative should include both development and environmental care, while also bringing accountability and cooperation between different stakeholders such as the government, private entrepreneurs, and NGOs.
Step 3: Evaluate the options.
- Option A is too extreme because stopping all developmental activities will harm people’s livelihood and growth.
- Option B is also extreme as it suggests completely ignoring the environment, which would lead to disastrous long-term consequences.
- Option C talks about eco-tourism but gives full control to the government. This centralization could cause inefficiencies and reduce private sector contribution.
- Option D is the most balanced, as it suggests eco-tourism but through public private partnership with NGOs. This ensures checks and balances, reduces inefficiencies, and promotes cooperative efforts between government, private sector, and NGOs.
- Option E focuses only on NGOs assessing policies. While useful, it does not directly create a sustainable and balanced development strategy.
Step 4: Conclude.
Option D provides a holistic solution. It ensures that eco-tourism is promoted while balancing the role of government, private entrepreneurs, and NGOs. This partnership fosters responsibility, accountability, and sustainable development. \[ \boxed{\text{Eco-tourism through public private partnership with NGO involvement is the best policy (Option D).}} \]

Answer 3

Step 1: Identify Bhola’s motive.
Bhola’s aim is to stop the degradation of the environment. This means the chosen measure must discourage polluters while encouraging active participation in afforestation.
Step 2: Evaluate each option.
- Option A is unfair because it charges cess from all businesses, even those that may not be polluting the environment. This makes it over-generalized and unjust.
- Option B is the best because it is fair and balanced. It penalizes polluters directly, whether they are citizens or industries, while rewarding those who are actively helping in afforestation.
- Option C focuses only on profit-making organizations and ignores citizens, making it incomplete.
- Option D is extreme as it neglects the environment completely.
- Option E rewards afforestation but fails to punish polluters, so it cannot fully solve the problem.
Step 3: Conclude.
The most practical and balanced approach is to penalize polluters and reward contributors. This ensures both responsibility and encouragement for sustainable practices. \[ \boxed{\text{Option B is the best measure.}} \]

Answer 4

Step 1: Understand the accusation.
The opposition claims that Bhola’s policies increased unemployment under the cover of environmental protection. Hence, the strongest counterargument must directly address the issue of employment data.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option A is weak because it only attacks the opposition and does not provide evidence.
- Option B highlights environmental improvement, but the accusation is about unemployment, not environment.
- Option C is the strongest because it uses employment data directly to counter the accusation. If unemployment has not increased, Bhola can prove the charges are baseless.
- Option D focuses only on cleaning drive employment, which is narrow and does not cover the overall employment issue.
- Option E dismisses the charges without evidence, which makes it weak and defensive.
Step 3: Conclude.
The most effective response is to compare actual unemployment levels after the policies. This evidence-based reply addresses the core of the opposition’s argument and provides Bhola a strong defense. \[ \boxed{\text{Option C is the best counterargument.}} \]