Comprehension
Prof. Vijya, the chairperson of the FAC, is tasked with determining the appropriate course of action.
The incident began with an allegation that Biswajit, a final year student, had inflated his grades on the bio-data submitted to potential employers. In response, the President of the SPC requested that the FAC bar Biswajit from the campus recruitment process.
During the FAC meeting to discuss the matter, a professor asserted that Biswajit should have the opportunity to defend himself. However, when Biswajit was brought into the meeting, the situation escalated. He alleged that other students, who he claimed were close to the President of the SPC, had also misrepresented their grades to secure jobs and had faced no consequences. Furthermore, Biswajit contended that his own grades had been deliberately manipulated by someone else in his bio-data.
These counter-allegations created confusion among the FAC members, leading to the decision to adjourn the meeting. Prof. Vijya is now left to decide the next steps in this multifaceted issue. The core of the problem involves not only the initial accusation against Biswajit but also his serious claims of favoritism and data tampering within the student placement process.
The incident began with an allegation that Biswajit, a final year student, had inflated his grades on the bio-data submitted to potential employers. In response, the President of the SPC requested that the FAC bar Biswajit from the campus recruitment process.
During the FAC meeting to discuss the matter, a professor asserted that Biswajit should have the opportunity to defend himself. However, when Biswajit was brought into the meeting, the situation escalated. He alleged that other students, who he claimed were close to the President of the SPC, had also misrepresented their grades to secure jobs and had faced no consequences. Furthermore, Biswajit contended that his own grades had been deliberately manipulated by someone else in his bio-data.
These counter-allegations created confusion among the FAC members, leading to the decision to adjourn the meeting. Prof. Vijya is now left to decide the next steps in this multifaceted issue. The core of the problem involves not only the initial accusation against Biswajit but also his serious claims of favoritism and data tampering within the student placement process.
Question: 1
If you were Vijya what in your opinion would be the most appropriate action?
If you were Vijya what in your opinion would be the most appropriate action?
Show Hint
In any managerial or administrative dilemma involving conflicting accusations, the first and most critical step is always to investigate and gather facts. Avoid making judgments or taking punitive action until a fair inquiry has been completed.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
- Debar Biswajit and the President of SPC from the placement process as they have failed to uphold the rules of the SPC.
- Suspend Biswajit and the President of SPC.
- Constitute a fact finding committee to investigate the matter and ask them to submit a report to you with in week's time.
- Apprise the corporate recruiters of the situation and assure them that corrective actions will be taken.
- Both options C and D.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Assess the current situation from Prof. Vijya's perspective.
Prof. Vijya is faced with a complex situation involving an initial accusation against Biswajit and serious counter-accusations from him about systemic issues, including favoritism and data tampering involving the SPC President. At this point, all claims are unsubstantiated allegations.
Step 2: Evaluate the proposed actions based on principles of fairness and due process.
(A) Debar Biswajit and the President: This is a punitive action. Taking such a step without any investigation would be unjust and premature. It assumes guilt based on accusations alone.
(B) Suspend Biswajit and the President: Similar to debarring, suspension is a disciplinary measure that requires evidence. It is not an appropriate first step in an inquiry.
(C) Constitute a fact-finding committee: This is the most logical and ethical first step. A formal investigation is necessary to gather evidence, hear all sides of the story, and establish the facts of the case. This respects the principle of due process for all parties involved—Biswajit, the SPC President, and the other students implicated.
(D) Apprise the corporate recruiters: Informing external stakeholders before an internal investigation is complete would be irresponsible. It could cause undue damage to the reputation of the students and the college based on unverified claims.
(E) Both options C and D: This option is incorrect because option D is an inappropriate action at this stage.
Step 3: Conclude the most appropriate action.
The immediate priority is to ascertain the truth in a fair and impartial manner. Therefore, initiating a formal investigation is the only responsible course of action.
Therefore: The most appropriate action is to constitute a fact-finding committee. \[ \boxed{\text{(C)}} \]
Prof. Vijya is faced with a complex situation involving an initial accusation against Biswajit and serious counter-accusations from him about systemic issues, including favoritism and data tampering involving the SPC President. At this point, all claims are unsubstantiated allegations.
Step 2: Evaluate the proposed actions based on principles of fairness and due process.
(A) Debar Biswajit and the President: This is a punitive action. Taking such a step without any investigation would be unjust and premature. It assumes guilt based on accusations alone.
(B) Suspend Biswajit and the President: Similar to debarring, suspension is a disciplinary measure that requires evidence. It is not an appropriate first step in an inquiry.
(C) Constitute a fact-finding committee: This is the most logical and ethical first step. A formal investigation is necessary to gather evidence, hear all sides of the story, and establish the facts of the case. This respects the principle of due process for all parties involved—Biswajit, the SPC President, and the other students implicated.
(D) Apprise the corporate recruiters: Informing external stakeholders before an internal investigation is complete would be irresponsible. It could cause undue damage to the reputation of the students and the college based on unverified claims.
(E) Both options C and D: This option is incorrect because option D is an inappropriate action at this stage.
Step 3: Conclude the most appropriate action.
The immediate priority is to ascertain the truth in a fair and impartial manner. Therefore, initiating a formal investigation is the only responsible course of action.
Therefore: The most appropriate action is to constitute a fact-finding committee. \[ \boxed{\text{(C)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
It was found that a large section of the students have been indulging in such practices. Unfortunately, the HR manager of a much coveted campus recruiter, who is an alumnus of the college came to know about this. Considering yourself in the position of that HR manager, what would be your reaction?
It was found that a large section of the students have been indulging in such practices. Unfortunately, the HR manager of a much coveted campus recruiter, who is an alumnus of the college came to know about this. Considering yourself in the position of that HR manager, what would be your reaction?
Show Hint
When faced with information that compromises data integrity, the most professional response is to seek official verification from the source. This addresses the problem directly without resorting to accusations or drastic actions.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
- Express your displeasure and stop any further recruitment from the college.
- Talk to your contact in the college and try to find out the truth.
- Do not change anything and continue the process as if nothing has happened.
- Ask the college to send a fresh set of bio-data as you wanted verified grades of the students.
- Ask the SPC to resend the details of the shortlisted students including their verified grades.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand the HR manager's primary responsibility.
The HR manager's main duty to their company is to hire competent and ethical candidates. The information about widespread grade inflation compromises the integrity of the data used for hiring decisions, posing a significant risk.
Step 2: Evaluate the options from the HR manager's perspective.
(A) Stop recruitment: This is an extreme reaction. It punishes honest students along with the dishonest ones and damages the long-term relationship with the alma mater.
(B) Talk to a contact: This is an informal approach. While it might provide some information, it doesn't solve the core problem of needing reliable, official data for recruitment.
(C) Do nothing: This is negligent. Ignoring a known integrity issue could lead to making poor hiring decisions and bringing dishonest individuals into the company.
(D) Ask the college for verified grades: This is the most professional and effective response. It is a non-confrontational request that directly addresses the problem by seeking officially verified data. It signals the company's commitment to integrity and places the responsibility on the college administration to ensure the accuracy of the information they provide.
(E) Ask the SPC to resend details: Given that the caselet implicates the SPC in potential wrongdoing and favoritism, asking them to resend data is not a reliable solution. The data may still be unverified. Going to "the college" (a higher authority) is more appropriate than going to the compromised "SPC."
Step 3: Determine the most professional course of action.
The best course of action is one that mitigates the hiring risk without burning bridges. Requesting official, verified data from the college achieves this perfectly.
Therefore: The HR manager should ask the college to send a fresh set of bio-data with verified grades. \[ \boxed{\text{(D)}} \]
The HR manager's main duty to their company is to hire competent and ethical candidates. The information about widespread grade inflation compromises the integrity of the data used for hiring decisions, posing a significant risk.
Step 2: Evaluate the options from the HR manager's perspective.
(A) Stop recruitment: This is an extreme reaction. It punishes honest students along with the dishonest ones and damages the long-term relationship with the alma mater.
(B) Talk to a contact: This is an informal approach. While it might provide some information, it doesn't solve the core problem of needing reliable, official data for recruitment.
(C) Do nothing: This is negligent. Ignoring a known integrity issue could lead to making poor hiring decisions and bringing dishonest individuals into the company.
(D) Ask the college for verified grades: This is the most professional and effective response. It is a non-confrontational request that directly addresses the problem by seeking officially verified data. It signals the company's commitment to integrity and places the responsibility on the college administration to ensure the accuracy of the information they provide.
(E) Ask the SPC to resend details: Given that the caselet implicates the SPC in potential wrongdoing and favoritism, asking them to resend data is not a reliable solution. The data may still be unverified. Going to "the college" (a higher authority) is more appropriate than going to the compromised "SPC."
Step 3: Determine the most professional course of action.
The best course of action is one that mitigates the hiring risk without burning bridges. Requesting official, verified data from the college achieves this perfectly.
Therefore: The HR manager should ask the college to send a fresh set of bio-data with verified grades. \[ \boxed{\text{(D)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
As a potential entrant you are having an informal Facebook chat with one of the college seniors. You wanted to know about the pay packages of the graduating students. The senior replied that one will be able to understand this only after joining the college. He did not reveal any information but suggested that it is not very difficult to get a high salary job as you have already started networking. He also cautioned that you should not believe any rumors and you should directly contact the student body for any further information. What will be your most appropriate choice for seeking further information about placements?
As a potential entrant you are having an informal Facebook chat with one of the college seniors. You wanted to know about the pay packages of the graduating students. The senior replied that one will be able to understand this only after joining the college. He did not reveal any information but suggested that it is not very difficult to get a high salary job as you have already started networking. He also cautioned that you should not believe any rumors and you should directly contact the student body for any further information. What will be your most appropriate choice for seeking further information about placements?
Show Hint
When making important decisions, always prioritize official and primary sources of information over informal, anecdotal, or secondary sources. For college-related matters, the administration is the most reliable source.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
- This conversation will increase your interest and you will network more with the students of the college for increasing your chances of getting a high salary job.
- You will contact the college authorities to get more insights about the placement process.
- You will start networking with the HR managers to understand their requirements.
- You will try to contact the President of SPC
- You will contact your other Facebook friends to find out about the placement activities at the college.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Analyze the quality of information received and the senior's advice.
The senior gives vague, non-committal answers and hints at the importance of "networking." Crucially, he advises you not to believe rumors and to seek official information. This suggests that informal channels (like other students) are not reliable.
Step 2: Evaluate the options for seeking reliable information.
(A) Network more with students: This contradicts the senior's advice to avoid rumors. Relying on student gossip is not a sound way to make a major life decision.
(B) Contact the college authorities: This is the most appropriate action. Official bodies like the Admissions Office or the Placement Office are mandated to provide accurate, verified information and statistics about placements. This is the most reliable source for a potential entrant.
(C) Network with HR managers: This is premature and unprofessional for a prospective student who has not even been admitted to the college.
(D) Contact the President of SPC: While the senior mentioned the "student body," the SPC is still a student-run organization. For official data, college authorities are a superior and more credible source than a student representative, especially given the context of the caselet.
(E) Contact other Facebook friends: This is another form of seeking out rumors, which you have been advised against.
Step 3: Conclude the best choice for obtaining factual information.
To get accurate and official information about placements, a prospective student should always go to the official source.
Therefore: The most appropriate choice is to contact the college authorities. \[ \boxed{\text{(B)}} \]
The senior gives vague, non-committal answers and hints at the importance of "networking." Crucially, he advises you not to believe rumors and to seek official information. This suggests that informal channels (like other students) are not reliable.
Step 2: Evaluate the options for seeking reliable information.
(A) Network more with students: This contradicts the senior's advice to avoid rumors. Relying on student gossip is not a sound way to make a major life decision.
(B) Contact the college authorities: This is the most appropriate action. Official bodies like the Admissions Office or the Placement Office are mandated to provide accurate, verified information and statistics about placements. This is the most reliable source for a potential entrant.
(C) Network with HR managers: This is premature and unprofessional for a prospective student who has not even been admitted to the college.
(D) Contact the President of SPC: While the senior mentioned the "student body," the SPC is still a student-run organization. For official data, college authorities are a superior and more credible source than a student representative, especially given the context of the caselet.
(E) Contact other Facebook friends: This is another form of seeking out rumors, which you have been advised against.
Step 3: Conclude the best choice for obtaining factual information.
To get accurate and official information about placements, a prospective student should always go to the official source.
Therefore: The most appropriate choice is to contact the college authorities. \[ \boxed{\text{(B)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
Vijya found that there were many such cases of grade inflation. She was giving final touches to the report when her attention was diverted by a phone call on her personal cell phone. It was from an unlisted number. The caller conveyed to her that it will be in her interest as well as in the interest of the college if the report is not presented to the Director. The caller also told her these findings will change nothing only result in bad publicity for the college. The caller identified himself as a well-wisher of the college before hanging up. Consider yourself in Vijya's position and choose an appropriate decision from the following choices.
Vijya found that there were many such cases of grade inflation. She was giving final touches to the report when her attention was diverted by a phone call on her personal cell phone. It was from an unlisted number. The caller conveyed to her that it will be in her interest as well as in the interest of the college if the report is not presented to the Director. The caller also told her these findings will change nothing only result in bad publicity for the college. The caller identified himself as a well-wisher of the college before hanging up. Consider yourself in Vijya's position and choose an appropriate decision from the following choices.
Show Hint
When faced with a threat or intimidation related to your professional duties, the correct response is never to ignore it or surrender to it. Always escalate the issue to your immediate superior to ensure your safety and receive guidance on how to uphold your responsibilities.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
- Disregard the phone call and do not share its details with others.
- Understand the implications of the phone call and apply for a leave.
- Call up the Director, tell him about the phone call, and excuse yourself from the responsibility.
- Talk to the Director and seek his opinion.
- Constitute a different committee to investigate the "phone call" and carry on with normal Activities.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Identify the nature of the event.
Vijya has received an anonymous phone call that is a clear attempt to intimidate her and suppress her official report. This constitutes a threat and an attempt to obstruct justice within the institution. It is a serious development that goes beyond the initial investigation.
Step 2: Evaluate the options based on professional responsibility and personal safety.
(A) Disregard and not share: Ignoring the call is one thing, but not informing her superior (the Director) is a serious error. The Director needs to be aware of any attempt to undermine the committee's work and any potential threats to his faculty.
(B) Apply for leave: This is an act of cowardice and an abdication of her duty. It allows the intimidation to succeed.
(C) Tell the Director and excuse yourself: Informing the Director is correct, but stepping down from the responsibility means she is giving in to the threat.
(D) Talk to the Director and seek his opinion: This is the most appropriate and responsible action. It fulfills her duty to keep her superior informed of all significant developments, especially threats. It ensures her personal safety by making the leadership aware of the situation. Seeking his opinion fosters a collaborative approach to handling the threat and deciding how to proceed with the report, strengthening the institutional response.
(E) Constitute a different committee: This is an unnecessary bureaucratic step that delays the submission of the primary report on grade inflation. The immediate issue is the threat and how to proceed, which requires discussion with leadership, not a new committee.
Step 3: Conclude the most balanced and ethical decision.
The correct course of action is to be transparent with her superior, ensuring that the institution's leadership is aware of the threat and can support her in fulfilling her duties.
Therefore: The best decision is to talk to the Director and seek his opinion. \[ \boxed{\text{(D)}} \]
Vijya has received an anonymous phone call that is a clear attempt to intimidate her and suppress her official report. This constitutes a threat and an attempt to obstruct justice within the institution. It is a serious development that goes beyond the initial investigation.
Step 2: Evaluate the options based on professional responsibility and personal safety.
(A) Disregard and not share: Ignoring the call is one thing, but not informing her superior (the Director) is a serious error. The Director needs to be aware of any attempt to undermine the committee's work and any potential threats to his faculty.
(B) Apply for leave: This is an act of cowardice and an abdication of her duty. It allows the intimidation to succeed.
(C) Tell the Director and excuse yourself: Informing the Director is correct, but stepping down from the responsibility means she is giving in to the threat.
(D) Talk to the Director and seek his opinion: This is the most appropriate and responsible action. It fulfills her duty to keep her superior informed of all significant developments, especially threats. It ensures her personal safety by making the leadership aware of the situation. Seeking his opinion fosters a collaborative approach to handling the threat and deciding how to proceed with the report, strengthening the institutional response.
(E) Constitute a different committee: This is an unnecessary bureaucratic step that delays the submission of the primary report on grade inflation. The immediate issue is the threat and how to proceed, which requires discussion with leadership, not a new committee.
Step 3: Conclude the most balanced and ethical decision.
The correct course of action is to be transparent with her superior, ensuring that the institution's leadership is aware of the threat and can support her in fulfilling her duties.
Therefore: The best decision is to talk to the Director and seek his opinion. \[ \boxed{\text{(D)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Analytical Decision Making
- Arya, a graduate from a reputable institute, got a job in an IT company but became bored after a year. Her best friend S, who worked at the same company, joined a top-tier B-school for an MBA, which tempted Arya to pursue the same path. Her friend assured her that an MBA would boost her career prospects and salary. Arya started preparing for an MBA while continuing her job, but the challenge of balancing preparation with work made her consider leaving the job.
- XAT - 2025
- Decision Making
- Analytical Decision Making
- There’s a community 30 km outside of the main city. Mr. S started a grocery business in the community after winning the bid by offering way above the rent initially drafted by the community council. The community council, led by Mr. D, agreed to the offer with a performance review every three years. Mr. S also agreed to provide an additional 15% of his grocery sales to the council, banking on the prospect of selling in higher volumes. After setting up his business, Mr. S noticed that SUV owners in the community usually bought goods in bulk from the city once a week and used his store primarily for daily necessities and occasional big purchases like mixer grinders.
- XAT - 2025
- Decision Making
- Analytical Decision Making
- What is the scope of Decision-making?
- Bihar BEd CET - 2024
- General Awareness
- Analytical Decision Making
- Complete the statement correctly and meaningfully. Owing to the acute power shortage, the people of our locality have decided to _____.
- TANCET - 2024
- Logical Reasoning
- Analytical Decision Making
In the given figure, how many huts are covered and muddy?
- TANCET - 2024
- Logical Reasoning
- Analytical Decision Making
View More Questions
Questions Asked in XAT exam
Match the following airlines with the countries where they are headquartered.
Airlines Countries 1. AirAsia A. Singapore 2. AZAL B. South Korea 3. Jeju Air C. Azerbaijan 4. Indigo D. India 5. Tigerair E. Malaysia - XAT - 2025
- Business and Economy
Match the following authors with their respective works.
Authors Books 1. Andy Weir A. Dune 2. Cixin Liu B. The Time Machine 3. Stephen Hawking C. The Brief History of Time 4. HG Wells D. The Martian 5. Frank Herbert E. The Three Body Problem - XAT - 2025
- Books and Authors
- What is the name of the AI-based app recently launched by the central government of India to provide study materials in regional languages?
- XAT - 2025
- Scientific Developments
- Which shipyard built INS Tushil, a stealth guided missile frigate, commissioned on Dec 9, 2024?
- XAT - 2025
- General Science
- Who won the SVERIGES RIKSBANK PRIZE in ECONOMIC Sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel 2024 for studies of how institutions are formed and affect prosperity?
- XAT - 2025
- Economy
View More Questions