Step 1: Linking facts to the principles. Principle 2 prohibits carrying unauthorized materials into the exam hall. Since Rohini was thoroughly checked and no such materials were found on her, it cannot be conclusively proved that she brought them in.
Step 2: Considering the evidence. The chits were found near her feet, but possession is not automatically established without proof. The possibility exists that they arrived there through other means.
Step 3: Reason for decision. Reason (ii) supports that a thorough check at entry serves as strong evidence she did not bring in unauthorized material. Without direct proof of possession or use, punishing her would be against the principles of fairness.
Step 4: Conclusion. Rohini cannot be punished for copying; the correct decision is (b) with reason (ii). \[ \boxed{\text{Correct answer: (d) (b) (ii)}} \]
Offenses | Sections |
(A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
(B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
(C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
(D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |