Question:

PRINCIPLE: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation."
FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.

Show Hint

Legal nuisance depends on whether the interference is unreasonable by normal standards, not based on one person’s special sensitivity.
Updated On: Aug 7, 2025
  • : Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house
  • : Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realised Jeevan's delicate nature
  • : Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevan
  • : None of the above
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The principle focuses on unlawful interference that is unreasonable. The sound of typing in a residential area does not qualify as unlawful interference unless it exceeds reasonable limits or is abnormal given the locality. Also, sensitivity of one particular person (Jeevan) cannot be the basis of establishing nuisance. Since the disturbance was only to Jeevan and no one else was affected, and the typing class is not an unreasonable activity per se, no liability arises. \fbox{Final Answer: (D): None of the above}
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Law of Torts

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions