Question:

Principle: Death caused by rash or negligent act of a person is an offence.
Facts: X was driving his SUV car in a lonely road leading to a forest at 160 km per hour. Suddenly, someone appears from the forest on the road and in the resultant accident, the car hits the commuter causing his death.

Show Hint

In case of accidents, even if there is no intention to harm, if the act is negligent or reckless, the person can still be held liable for the injury or death caused.
Updated On: Aug 14, 2025
  • X is not guilty of an offence as the accident has occurred on a lonely road
  • X is not guilty because there was no intention to kill the deceased
  • X is guilty of an offence death by rash or negligent act
  • X is not guilty because he was also injured in the accident
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The principle clearly mentions that death caused by rash or negligent act is an offence. In this case, X was driving at a high speed (160 km/h), which is considered rash or negligent, especially in a lonely road where the presence of others could be less predictable. Even though X did not intend to kill the deceased, the fact that the accident occurred due to the high speed of the vehicle implies that X is guilty of causing death by rash or negligent driving. The accident, although in a lonely area, still resulted in a fatality due to X's actions, making him guilty under the principle of rash or negligent driving.
Thus, the correct answer is (C).
Option (A) is incorrect because the location of the accident does not absolve one from negligence. Option (B) is incorrect because intention to kill is not necessary for a charge of rash or negligent act. Option (D) is incorrect because being injured in the accident does not absolve one from criminal responsibility for rash driving.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions