Question:

Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when an apprehension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use physical force against his body.
Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggressively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platform at a distance.

Show Hint

Assault requires an immediate threat of physical harm, which was not present in this case as 'B' was at a distance.
Updated On: Aug 18, 2025
  • 'A' has caused apprehension of assault in the mind of 'B'.
  • 'A' has committed assault against 'B'.
  • 'A' has not committed assault against 'B'.
  • 'A' has caused fear of assault in the mind of 'B'.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

According to the principle, for assault to be committed, the victim must have apprehended an immediate threat of physical harm. In this case, 'B' was standing at a distance on the platform, and although 'A' was shaking his fists, there was no imminent threat as 'B' was not within physical reach. Therefore, 'A' did not commit assault.


Option (A) 'A' has caused apprehension of assault in the mind of 'B': This is incorrect. Apprehension must be immediate for it to qualify as assault.

Option (B) 'A' has committed assault against 'B': This is incorrect, as no physical harm or threat was made that caused fear of immediate harm.

Option (D) 'A' has caused fear of assault in the mind of 'B': While 'B' might have felt some fear, this is not the same as assault under the legal definition.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions